Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al's Transfer, Inc., 271 P.2d 477.
- Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2023
-
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election
Ariz. 2023
See Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co., Inc. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., (“[A] decision of [an agency] which goes beyond its power as prescribed by the Constitution and statutes is vulnerable for lack of jurisdiction and may be questioned in a collateral proceeding.”); Ariz. Pub.
- Legacy v. Citizens Clean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Legacy v. Citizens Clean
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
of Regents, 160 Ariz. at 154–55; see also Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., –28 (1954) (although not directly stated, party did not have opportunity to raise issue in prior proceeding).
- Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission
251 P.3d 400
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., , (citation omitted); see also George v. Ariz. Corp. Comm’n, , (because the Commission’s action was “a bare usurpation of power ...
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 959 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1998
-
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
959 P.2d 1256
Ariz. 1998
See Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al's Transfer, Inc., , -80 (1954) ("The rule is that general rules and regulations of an administrative board or commission prescribing methods of procedure have the effect of law and are binding on the Commission and must be followed by it so long as they are in force and effect.").
- Southwest Ambulance, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Health Services 902 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Southwest Ambulance, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Health Services
902 P.2d 1362
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
at 156 , 771 P.2d at 886 ; Dallas v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, -48 , -55 (1959); Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co., Inc. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc.
- Tonto Creek Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 864 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Tonto Creek Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission
864 P.2d 1081
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Tucson *57 Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, , -80 (1954).
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 845 P.2d 1125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
845 P.2d 1125
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
See Gibbons v. Arizona Corp. Comm’n, -347 , cf. Tucson Warehouse and Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, , (a Commission decision which goes beyond its power as prescribed by constitution and statutes is vulnerable for lack of jurisdiction).
- Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public … 771 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public …
771 P.2d 880
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co., Inc. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc.
- State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of Phoenix 651 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of Phoenix
651 P.2d 862
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer
- Kunkle Transfer & Storage Co. v. Superior Court 526 P.2d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
Kunkle Transfer & Storage Co. v. Superior Court
526 P.2d 1270
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc.
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Tucson Insurance & Bonding Agency 415 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
-
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Tucson Insurance & Bonding Agency
415 P.2d 472
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc.
- Hays v. Arizona Corporation Commission 409 P.2d 282 Ariz. 1965
-
Hays v. Arizona Corporation Commission
409 P.2d 282
Ariz. 1965
Hence, the statement in Tucson Warehouse & , cited by the appellee, that the Commission's orders are binding on the Commission and must be followed by it, is correct, but not applicable here.
- Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission 390 P.2d 582 Ariz. 1964
-
Gibbons v. Arizona Corporation Commission
390 P.2d 582
Ariz. 1964
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., , .
- George v. Arizona Corporation Commission 322 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1958
- Timmerman v. Lightning Moving & Warehouse Co. 322 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1958
-
Timmerman v. Lightning Moving & Warehouse Co.
322 P.2d 376
Ariz. 1958
This was decided adversely to his contention in Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., , .
-
George v. Arizona Corporation Commission
322 P.2d 369
Ariz. 1958
Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, Inc., , .
- Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Old Pueblo Transit Co. 289 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1955
-
Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Old Pueblo Transit Co.
289 P.2d 406
Ariz. 1955
In the more recent case of Tucson Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Al’s Transfer, , , we again struck down an ex parte order of the Commission as being void and therefore vulnerable to collateral attack for lack of jurisdiction.