Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Jones v. Lockhart, 265 P.2d 447.

42 citing documents.

Biggs v. cooper/brewer 323 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Biggs v. cooper/brewer 323 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-53 (1953) (noting that constitutional provisions must be analyzed by “the whole of the provision and its relation to other parts of the Constitution”); (observing that “we would be compelled to c
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
-53 (1953) (noting that “no constitutional provision is to be construed piece-meal, and regard must be had to the whole of the provision and its relation to other parts of the Constitution”).
Bentley v. Building Our Future 172 P.3d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Bentley v. Building Our Future 172 P.3d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Stummer 171 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Stummer 171 P.3d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
( , 185 P. 136, 140 (1919)).
Arizona Together v. Brewer 149 P.3d 742 Ariz. 2007
Arizona Together v. Brewer 149 P.3d 742 Ariz. 2007
Korte v. Bayless 16 P.3d 200 Ariz. 2001
Korte v. Bayless 16 P.3d 200 Ariz. 2001
-96 , (upholding an initiative that would both increase the number of senators representing each county and change the representation and apportionment in the house of representatives).
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
(determining that the word “elected” refers to the regular election process).
Ruiz v. Hull 957 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1998
Ruiz v. Hull 957 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1998
Mathieu v. Mahoney 851 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1993
Slayton v. Shumway 800 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1990
Slayton v. Shumway 800 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1990
Tilson v. Mofford 737 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1987
Tilson v. Mofford 737 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1987
P.2d 447 (1953); Hood v. State, 24 Ariz.App.
Bearup v. Voss 690 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bearup v. Voss 690 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laos v. Arnold 685 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Laos v. Arnold 685 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
but also whether a person who lawfully entered an office has subsequently become disqualified.
American Bus Lines, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 633 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1981
American Bus Lines, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 633 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1981
Hood v. State 539 P.2d 931 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hood v. State 539 P.2d 931 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State ex rel. Nelson v. Yuma County Board of Supervisors 511 P.2d 630 Ariz. 1973
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
Ward v. Stevens 344 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1959
Ward v. Stevens 344 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1959
260 P. 435 ; , 180 P. 151 .
Bohannan v. Corporation Commission 313 P.2d 379 Ariz. 1957
Bohannan v. Corporation Commission 313 P.2d 379 Ariz. 1957
certiorari denied 329 U.S. 784 , 67 S.Ct.
Brown v. Superior Court 303 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1956
Brown v. Superior Court 303 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1956
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Nabours 286 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1955
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Nabours 286 P.2d 752 Ariz. 1955
State ex rel. Jones v. MacDonald 265 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1953
State ex rel. Jones v. MacDonald 265 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1953