Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Wise, 671 P.2d 909.

113 citing documents.

State v. McIntosh 146 P.3d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. McIntosh 146 P.3d 80 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc. 142 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc. 142 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (explaining courts may reference dictionaries to glean ordinary meaning of words).
Committee for Preservation of Established Neighborhoods v. Riffel 141 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Committee for Preservation of Established Neighborhoods v. Riffel 141 P.3d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
The plain meaning of “insert” includes “to put or thrust in” and “to put or introduce into the body of something.” Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 604 (10th ed.1993); , 470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (explaining courts may reference dictionaries to glean ordinary meaning of words).
Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc. 118 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc. 118 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 105 P.3d 1163 Ariz. 2005
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 105 P.3d 1163 Ariz. 2005
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (noting that where contested words were not defined in the statute, and where there is "no indication that the Legislature intended that either word be given an extraordinary meaning, reference to an established, widely respected dictionary for the ordinary meaning of these w
State v. Stroud 103 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2005
State v. Stroud 103 P.3d 912 Ariz. 2005
§ 1-213 (2002) (requiring that words in statutes “be construed according to the common and approved use of the language”); n.3, n.3 (1983) (stating that “words and phrases in statutes shall be given their ordinary meaning unless it appears from context or otherwise that a different meaning is intended”).
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (acknowledging that unless legislature clearly expresses intent to give term a special meaning, court gives words used in statutes their plain and ordinary meaning, which can be gleaned from dictionaries).
In re Ubaldo B. 81 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
In re Ubaldo B. 81 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
“It is clear that words and phrases in statutes shall be given their ordinary meaning unless it appears from context or otherwise that a different meaning is intended.” , 470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (citation omitted).
In Re John M. 36 P.3d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
In Re John M. 36 P.3d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
State v. Thompson 34 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
State v. Thompson 34 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983) (Random House Dictionary of the English Language-used in statutory construction context); -25, ¶ 7 , -34 (App.2000) (Webster’s Third New International Dictionary); ¶¶ 12-13 , 975 P.2d
In Re Paul M. 7 P.3d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re Paul M. 7 P.3d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
To determine the ordinary meaning of “abuse,” we may refer to “an established, widely respected dictionary.” , 470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983); see also Sierra Tucson.
State v. Mahaney 975 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Mahaney 975 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
470 n. 3, , 911 n. 3 (1983).
Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Pima County 871 P.2d 762 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Pima County 871 P.2d 762 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Tartaglia v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 867 Ariz. 1994
Tartaglia v. Industrial Commission 866 P.2d 867 Ariz. 1994
State Ex Rel. Hance v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 875 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State Ex Rel. Hance v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 875 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
While we generally assume the Legislature intended a meaning other than one resulting in redundancy, , the legislative intent here is clearly reflected by the broad grant of authority in subsection (A)(4).
State v. Bews 868 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Bews 868 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Tartaglia v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Tartaglia v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 886 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
§ 23-1062(B) their ordinary meaning, , we believe the first seven-day period a worker is absent from work means seven working days.
Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 825 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 825 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. Hassell 790 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1990
Southwestern Teamsters Security Fund v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 757 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Southwestern Teamsters Security Fund v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 757 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Technical words and phrases and those which have *361 acquired a particular and appropriate meaning in the law shall be construed according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.” See also, , Western Coach Corp. v. Malibu Corp., 22 Ariz.App.
Roberts v. City of Mesa 760 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Roberts v. City of Mesa 760 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Allen v. Girard 745 P.2d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987