Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Metals Corporation v. Roth, 284 P.2d 645.

53 citing documents.

McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc. 34 P.3d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc. 34 P.3d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
¶ 19 Rule 5(c) permits service by mail and provides in pertinent part, “Service by mail is complete upon mailing.” It is well established in the case law that, pursuant to this rule, service is “not dependent upon the receipt of same by opposing counsel.” -09 , (interpreting predecessor Rule 5(b)); Columbia Group
Hall v. Lalli 977 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1999
Hall v. Lalli 977 P.2d 776 Ariz. 1999
“It is a rule as old as the law that no one shall be personally bound until he has had his day in court....” , (quoting 12 Am.Jur.
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
it is a rule as old as the law that no one shall be personally bound until he has had his day in court____” , (quoting 12 Am.Jur.
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ruiz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 847 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 831 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Iphaar v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 831 P.2d 422 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Cravens, Dargan & Co. v. Superior Court 737 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1987
Cravens, Dargan & Co. v. Superior Court 737 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1987
Judgment without such citation and opportunity lacks all the attributes of a judicial determination; it is judicial usurpation and oppression and can never be upheld where justice is fairly administered____ -10 , quoting 12 Am.Jur.
Columbia Group, Inc. v. Jackson 725 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Columbia Group, Inc. v. Jackson 725 P.2d 1120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Smith v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
National Investment Co. v. Estate of Bronner 704 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
National Investment Co. v. Estate of Bronner 704 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
See McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers, supra
Tarr v. Superior Court in & for Pima County 690 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Tarr v. Superior Court in & for Pima County 690 P.2d 90 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
McClintock cites two earlier Arizona cases
Matter of Estate of Kerr 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Valley National Bank v. Dykstra 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Matter of Estate of Kerr 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Rule 5(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure
Valley National Bank v. Dykstra 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Rule 5(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure; , Blickenstaff v. Industrial Comm’n of Arizona
Paragon Building Corp. v. Turner 580 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Paragon Building Corp. v. Turner 580 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
RICHMOND, Chief Judge, dissenting: Although I cannot disagree with the legal reasoning expressed by the majority, I would hold the judgment void on the ground that appellant was not in default at the time the judgment was entered, , because the open extension of time to answer the complaint had never been effectively revoked.
Blakeway v. Texas Business Investments Co. 470 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Blakeway v. Texas Business Investments Co. 470 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
See *393 , Findlay v. Board of Sup’rs, , 16A C.J.S.
Smith v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Smith v. Industrial Commission 466 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Edwards v. Van Voorhis 463 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Edwards v. Van Voorhis 463 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
The defendant mortgagors next contend that the default judgment against the defendants Amscon and Reliance is invalid because the defendant mortgagors were given no notice of plaintiffs’ application therefor, citing Rule 58(d), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Haver v. Superior Court 453 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Haver v. Superior Court 453 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
271 P.2d *425 484 (1954); , Dart v. Valley National Bank of Arizona, 5 Ariz.App.
Marsh v. Hawkins 437 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 436 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1968
McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 436 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1968
is directly applicable and controls the decision in the present case.
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Sandoval v. Chenoweth 428 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1967
Sandoval v. Chenoweth 428 P.2d 98 Ariz. 1967
The elements of due process in regard to notice and right to a , , as follows: “ ‘The essential elements of due process of law are notice and an opportunity to be heard and to defend in an orderly proceeding adapted to the nature of the case before a tribunal having jurisdiction of the cause.
Velasco v. Mallory 427 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Velasco v. Mallory 427 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 423 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
McClintock v. Serv-Us Bakers 423 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
establishes the law of Arizona to be that where an answer has been timely filed á judgment entered “by default” and without notice against the answering party is void.
Carpenter v. Superior Court 422 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1966
Carpenter v. Superior Court 422 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1966
Coulas v. Smith 395 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1964
Coulas v. Smith 395 P.2d 527 Ariz. 1964
The defendant contends that the “default” judgment entered against him was void, since he did not receive 3 days’ notice of the application for judgment by default pursuant to Rule 55 (b) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Lincoln-Mercury-Phoenix, Inc. v. Base 322 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1958
Lincoln-Mercury-Phoenix, Inc. v. Base 322 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1958
that notice and an opportunity to be heard are essential elements of due process, and without same a court lacks jurisdiction and a judgment based thereon is void and subject to attack at any time.
National Public Service Insurance Co. v. Welch 302 P.2d 926 Ariz. 1956