Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phelps Dodge Corporation v. Cabarga, 285 P.2d 605.

38 citing documents.

Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Mont Polanco v. Ica Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
¶11 Arizona’s constitution and workers’ compensation statutes do not define the term “injury.” Our supreme court, however, has long held an accidental injury occurs “when usual exertion leads to something actually breaking or letting go with an obvious sudden organic or structural change in the body.” (emphasis added); see also Caganich v. Indus.
Glodo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Glodo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 955 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Those cases suggest that when an “intentional” act is the cause, it is the “unusual” or “unexpected” result that justifies the classification of the injury as an “accident.” , (unexpected death as a result of ordinary work activities constitutes accident covered by statute); , 452-53, (unexpected result — poisoning and resultant death — constitutes accident).
Aguiar v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 797 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Aguiar v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 797 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
In fact, in [Phelps Dodge Corp. v.] Cabarga, [ , ], we held that where the usual exertion of employment precipitates a heart attack it is, nevertheless, compensable.
Wills v. Pima County Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board 743 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Wills v. Pima County Public Safety Personnel Retirement Board 743 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Neece v. Industrial Commission, 7 Ariz.App.
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
the Supreme Court stated: Nearly twenty-five years ago, , we held that where the usual exertion of employment precipitates a heart attack it is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State.
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
There must be a “recognizable, causal connection.”
Bell Road Mini Storage v. Industrial Commission 605 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1980
Bell Road Mini Storage v. Industrial Commission 605 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1980
Nearly twenty-five years ago, , we held that where the usual exertion of employment precipitates a heart attack it is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State.
Ayer v. Industrial Commission 531 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Ayer v. Industrial Commission 531 P.2d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Central National Life Insurance Co. v. Peterson 529 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Central National Life Insurance Co. v. Peterson 529 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Brown v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Brown v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
McNeely v. Industrial Commission 501 P.2d 555 Ariz. 1972
McNeely v. Industrial Commission 501 P.2d 555 Ariz. 1972
Stotts v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Stotts v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Phelps Dodge Corporation, , , ; see 1A A. Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensa *292 tion § 38.20 (1971).
Neece v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Neece v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 539 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Thiel v. Industrial Commission, 1 Ariz.App.
Davis v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 866 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Davis v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 866 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Paulley v. Industrial Commission, supra
Ware v. Industrial Commission 375 P.2d 384 Ariz. 1962
Ware v. Industrial Commission 375 P.2d 384 Ariz. 1962
Paulley v. Industrial Commission 371 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1962
Paulley v. Industrial Commission 371 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1962
Revles v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 352 P.2d 759 Ariz. 1960
Revles v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 352 P.2d 759 Ariz. 1960
See, Jones v. Industrial Commission, supra; , ; Hartford Accident & , 299 P. 1026 ; , ; Phelps Dodge Corp., , ; , .
Gronowski v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 306 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1957
Gronowski v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 306 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1957
in my fifteen years of practice I found it in both, heavy manual labor and also light sedimentary type work.” We have held that we would sustain the commission for allowing compensation when the medical evidence was to the effect that a death from heart failure was contributed to by the strain of decedent’s labor immediately preceding death, Phelps Dodge Corp., , ; that we would sustain the commission in denying compensation when the evidence was susceptible of interpretation that the labors wer
Jones v. Industrial Commission 306 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1957
Jones v. Industrial Commission 306 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1957
in which they assert a parallel fact situation existed.