Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mollohan v. Christy, 294 P.2d 375.

29 citing documents.

MALONEY v. DEMOFF Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶16 Maloney’s does not stand for the proposition that parties must be in a fiduciary relationship to receive an equitable accounting.
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
To be subject to court-ordered accounting, a defendant “ ‘must appear to have been intrusted with property of the plaintiff and, in consequence to have become bound to reveal his dealings with it.’ ” , -77 (1956) (quoting Reinhard v. Reinhard, 56 N.Y.S.2d 160 , 161-62 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1945)).
Divizio v. Kewin Enterprises, Inc. 666 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Divizio v. Kewin Enterprises, Inc. 666 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Young v. Lucas Const. Co., supra
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
and Reliable Electric Co. v. Clinton Campbell Contractor, Inc., supra.
Brown v. Brown 488 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Brown v. Brown 488 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Associates Finance Corporation v. Walters 470 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Associates Finance Corporation v. Walters 470 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Navajo County v. Four Corners Pipe Line Co. 470 P.2d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Navajo County v. Four Corners Pipe Line Co. 470 P.2d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Rule 52(a) Rules of Civil Procedure; , ; Gillespie Land & , * * *”
Lefkowitz v. ARIZONA TRUST COMPANY 459 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lefkowitz v. ARIZONA TRUST COMPANY 459 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
to, should rest on the trustee; but that if he makes out a prima facie case the burden of producing contradictory evidence rests on the beneficiary who has objected.” Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, (Second Ed.1962), § 970, at 203-204, citing, inter alia, In re Warren’s Estate, , modified on other grounds
Carrasco v. Carrasco 422 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Carrasco v. Carrasco 422 P.2d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Accord, , where the parties were joint venturers.
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. 421 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1966
Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. 421 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1966
In re Schuster’s Estate, , 281 P. 38 (1929).
King Realty, Inc. v. Grantwood Cemeteries, Inc. 417 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
King Realty, Inc. v. Grantwood Cemeteries, Inc. 417 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Lenslite Co. v. Zocher 388 P.2d 421 Ariz. 1964
Lenslite Co. v. Zocher 388 P.2d 421 Ariz. 1964
Rossi v. Stewart 367 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1961
Rossi v. Stewart 367 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1961
Rule 52(a) Rules of Civil Procedure; , Gillespie Land &amp
Beckwith v. Clevenger Realty Co. 360 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1961
Beckwith v. Clevenger Realty Co. 360 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1961
Fernandez v. Garza 354 P.2d 260 Ariz. 1960
Fernandez v. Garza 354 P.2d 260 Ariz. 1960
where the parties were joint adventurers, we said that the plaintiff who had placed his affairs in the hands of the defendant was entitled to an accounting and the burden was on the defendant to support with competent evidence the disbursements made.