Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Perez, 687 P.2d 1214.
- State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Willcoxson 751 P.2d 1385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
State v. Willcoxson
751 P.2d 1385
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
The best authority for the state’s
- State v. Lopez 754 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Stein 735 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Stein 735 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Youngblood 734 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
State v. Youngblood
734 P.2d 592
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
also present fact situations which differ from the present case.
- State v. Harris 730 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- State v. Harris 730 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Lee 708 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
State v. Lee
708 P.2d 102
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
We conclude the evidence produced at the hearing on the motion to sever was sufficient to warrant joinder on the basis of a
- State v. Vincent 708 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Vincent 708 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984
- Oshrin v. Coulter 688 P.2d 1001 Ariz. 1984