DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Perkins, 686 P.2d 1248.

73 citing documents.

  • State v. Emanuel 768 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Emanuel 768 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • Fiveash v. Superior Court of Arizona 752 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • Fiveash v. Superior Court of Arizona 752 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
    Further, our supreme court has cautioned that “any provision relating to disqualification of judges must be given strict construction to safeguard the judiciary from frivolous attacks upon its dignity and integrity and to ensure the orderly function of the judicial system.” , overruled on other grounds
  • State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
  • McElhanon v. Hing 728 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1986
  • McElhanon v. Hing 728 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Thompson 724 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Thompson 724 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
    -24 , -76 (1984) (defense counsel admitted that he failed to interview from 20 to 30 witnesses); , (substitute counsel at sentencing, after stating he was unfamiliar with the case, had nothing to say on defendant’s behalf); -50 , -78 (1983) (counsel refused to actively participate in *458 trial after his motion to disqualify the jud
  • State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
    at 127 , 639 P.2d at 317
  • State v. Roberts 698 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Roberts 698 P.2d 1291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
    the court held that a defendant is denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing when counsel’s role is no more significant than that of a neutral observer.
  • State v. Ennis 689 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Ennis 689 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    State v. Ethridge, 126 * P.2d 59 (1980)
  • State v. Bolt 689 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1984