Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Jones v. Superior Court, 280 P.2d 691.

38 citing documents.

State v. Pickett 589 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1978
State v. Pickett 589 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1978
170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976)
State v. Sanders 574 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sanders 574 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Snyder 544 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Snyder 544 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
However, it has long been held that this statute prohibits the act of fellatio
State v. Bateman 540 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Bateman 540 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dugger 497 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dugger 497 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Burchett 484 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1971
State v. Burchett 484 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1971
State v. Bennin 480 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1971
State v. Bennin 480 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1971
State v. Davis 467 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1970
State v. Davis 467 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1970
we held that while a minute entry bearing the date of August 23 showing a transaction that was recorded as occurring on August 22 was a mere irregularity not affecting the substantial rights of the petitioner.
State v. Madrid 450 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Madrid 450 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Bidgood v. State ex rel. Eyman 432 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Bidgood v. State ex rel. Eyman 432 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Application of Kirk 431 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Application of Kirk 431 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Kruchten 417 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1966
Garcia v. Eyman 417 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Kruchten 417 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1966
cf. Rodriguez v. Sacks, 173 Ohio St.
Garcia v. Eyman 417 P.2d 550 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Court of Appeals, Division Two 416 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1966
State v. Court of Appeals, Division Two 416 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1966
Eyman v. McPherson 405 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Eyman v. McPherson 405 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Applications of Oppenheimer 389 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1964
Applications of Oppenheimer 389 P.2d 696 Ariz. 1964
State v. Dowthard 373 P.2d 357 Ariz. 1962
State v. Dowthard 373 P.2d 357 Ariz. 1962
5 The minute entry made at the time reads: “Defendant is arraigned for sentence and IT IS ORDERED the sentence may be a minimum term of 3 years and a maximum term of 5 years in the State Penitentiary.” We have previously stated that “minute entries are of necessity condensed” and that “it is only in the recording of the formal judgment that it is copied in toto.” , 280 P.2d *49 691, certiorari denied 349 U.S. 922 , 75 S.Ct.
State v. Morales 363 P.2d 606 Ariz. 1961
State v. Morales 363 P.2d 606 Ariz. 1961
People ex rel. Gusick v. Eyman 303 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1956
People ex rel. Gusick v. Eyman 303 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1956
Jones v. Superior Court, on certiorari, , , where we considered and determined every issue raised in this petition.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by