Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McNair, 687 P.2d 1230.

104 citing documents.

State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Lopez 762 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1988
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
quoting Levering v. Commonwealth, 132 Ky.
State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Miller 755 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Miller 755 P.2d 434 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Swoopes 747 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Swoopes 747 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
State v. Hurley 741 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1987
See Turner, 141 Ariz. at 475 , 687 P.2d at 1229
State v. Felix 737 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Felix 737 P.2d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Pacheco 730 P.2d 262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Pacheco 730 P.2d 262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
“It is only when the instructions taken as a whole are such that it is reasonable to suppose the jury would be misled thereby that a case should be reversed for error therein.” , ( , 283 P. 711, 716 (1929)).
State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Kinkade 709 P.2d 884 Ariz. 1985
State v. Kinkade 709 P.2d 884 Ariz. 1985
State v. Celaya, 135 Ariz. at 252 , 660 P.2d at 853 .
State v. Cocio 709 P.2d 1336 Ariz. 1985
State v. Cocio 709 P.2d 1336 Ariz. 1985
upheld a life imprisonment sentence imposed pursuant to § 13-604.01 based on the severity of these two factors: “Repeat offenders have typically received more severe sentences than first offenders.
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
but argues that the instant case presents a different situation because the victim here was not hurt and the underlying felony was not a completed but only an attempted armed robbery.
State v. Sowards 709 P.2d 513 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sowards 709 P.2d 513 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lee 708 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Lee 708 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Carter 700 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1985
State v. Carter 700 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1985
(it is not necessary that there be a jury determination as to whether the defendant was on probation *111 in enhancing punishment pursuant to A.R.S.
State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
State v. Perkins 699 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 678 Ariz. 1985
State v. Hutton 694 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1985
State v. Hutton 694 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1985
State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
We have reviewed the jury instructions and conclude the jury was properly instructed, , 481 therefore, Carriger’s claim is without merit.
State v. Goswick 691 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1984
State v. Goswick 691 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1984
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984