Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. Barlow, 296 P.2d 298.

76 citing documents.

In re Appeal in Pima County No. J-64016 619 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
In re Appeal in Pima County No. J-64016 619 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
: “In our opinion the denial of the right to effective participation of counsel constitutes a denial of due process of law so gross as to lack a necessary attribute of a judicial determination.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (Reversed on other grounds); Arizona State Dept, , .
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Stuard v. Bean 554 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Stuard v. Bean 554 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Ex parte Winn, , , 193 P. 17 (1920).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482 536 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1975
Maricopa County Appeal No. J-68100 v. Haire 486 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1971
Maricopa County Appeal No. J-68100 v. Haire 486 P.2d 791 Ariz. 1971
1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (Reversed on other grounds); , .
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 455 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Anguis v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Anguis v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 702 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
246 , 63 N.W.2d 151, 156 .”
Charboneau v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 422 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1967
Charboneau v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 422 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1967
Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 412 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1966
Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 412 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1966
Application of Gault 407 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1965
Application of Gault 407 P.2d 760 Ariz. 1965
State v. Garaygordobil 359 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1961
State v. Garaygordobil 359 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1961
We have also held that “representation by one’s duly constituted attorney is fundamental to our system of administration of justice.” , .
Clifford v. Woodford 320 P.2d 452 Ariz. 1957
Clifford v. Woodford 320 P.2d 452 Ariz. 1957
Neither does the sole fact that one is the parent and able and willing to care for it necessarily have this effect, because this could easily be true and yet the best interest of the child be subserved by placing it in the custody of another.” *263 , , recognized the above to be the rule.