Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. De Nistor, 694 P.2d 237.
-
State v. Thompson
950 P.2d 1176
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-13 , -43 (1985), the supreme court considered the timeliness of a motion for self-representation.
- State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Walden 905 P.2d 974 Ariz. 1995
- Espinoza v. Martin 894 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1995
- Espinoza v. Martin 894 P.2d 688 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Smith 904 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
State v. Smith
904 P.2d 1248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
6 Currently, it remains clear that an accused may waive the constitutional right to counsel, , the right to appear and defend in person, , the right to confront witnesses, , the right to a jury trial, , cert.
- State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Cornell 878 P.2d 1352 Ariz. 1994
- State v. Renner 868 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
State v. Renner
868 P.2d 978
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(a judge must independently evaluate each plea bargain that is entered in his or her court “to see if the ends of justice and the protection of the public are being served”); , (acceptance or rejection of a plea bargain is a discretionary ruling); , (prior judge’s willingness to accept defendant’s proposal, which was not part of bargain, did not bind sentencing judge).
- Peterson v. Superior Court 842 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Peterson v. Superior Court 842 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Diaz 835 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Diaz 835 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Binder 826 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Binder 826 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Cooper 800 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Cooper 800 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Korzep 791 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Korzep 791 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Lichon 786 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Lichon 786 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Brooks 777 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Brooks 777 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Campas v. Superior Court 767 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Campas v. Superior Court 767 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. LaGrand 733 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1987
-
State v. LaGrand
733 P.2d 1066
Ariz. 1987
2525, 2527 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); , Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 24; see Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct.
- State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985