Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Henley, 687 P.2d 1220.

103 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Powers 23 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
See, -68 , -23 (1984) (assault occurs when defendant causes injury to another person; firing one bullet can result in two separate injuries and can support two separate assaults).
State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000
State v. Anderson 4 P.3d 369 Ariz. 2000
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Smith 4 P.3d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(defendant has right to twelve-person jury under state constitution when potential, rather than actual, sentence is thirty or more years, and right attaches when jury begins deliberations).
State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(no error in imposing consecutive sentences for two counts of aggravated assault based upon firing a gun when bullet passed through first victim and struck second); , (consecutive sentences for each offense upheld when single act caused separ
State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
(errors involving improper instructions are harmless unless prejudice resulted).
State v. Pope 961 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Pope 961 P.2d 1067 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-68 , -23 (1984); -14 , -32 (App.1990).
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Valdez 894 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Freeland 863 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
-69 , -24 (1984) (fundamental error not reversible error when substantial evidence in record supports verdict and error did not, beyond reasonable doubt, contribute significantly to verdict).
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
19 “Absent fundamental error, error is usually considered to be waived on appeal unless it was objected to at trial.”
State v. Luque 829 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Luque 829 P.2d 1244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Smith, 141 Ariz. at 535 , 687 P.2d at 1290 .
State v. Hamblin 797 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Hamblin 797 P.2d 1229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
§ 13-116.” -68 , -23 (1984).
State v. Wideman 798 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Wideman 798 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Lee 774 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Lee 774 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. White 773 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. White 773 P.2d 482 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
State v. Albrecht 762 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Albrecht 762 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Alvarado 761 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Alvarado 761 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Lundstrom 759 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Lundstrom 759 P.2d 631 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Garland 756 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Garland 756 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Even a finding of fundamental error does not require reversal “when there is substantial evidence in the record to support the verdict and it can be said that the error did not, beyond a reasonable doubt, contribute significantly to the verdict.”
State v. Renforth 746 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Renforth 746 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Holder 745 P.2d 141 Ariz. 1987
State v. Holder 745 P.2d 141 Ariz. 1987
State v. Devine 724 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Devine 724 P.2d 593 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Prince 689 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1984