Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Henderson, 313 P.2d 404.

62 citing documents.

Metro Phx Bank v. Rpm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Metro Phx Bank v. Rpm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(noting proper recovery for conversion is “the value of the property [taken plus] interest”); accord Restatement (Second) of Torts § 927 (1979); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 222A cmt.
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West 50 P.3d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
v. Henderson, , -06 (1957), and recognizing torfc of bad faith claim based on insurer’s failure to settle with third party).
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
v. Henderson, , Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Cas.
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 1092 Ariz. 1996
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 1092 Ariz. 1996
v. Henderson, , -06 (1957).
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 893 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 893 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
v. Henderson, , held that an insured’s bad faith cause of action accrues when the insured “has become obligated to pay a judgment wrongfully imposed upon him....” These cases support the conclusion that a cause of action accrues when a party has a legal right to sue.
SOUTHWEST SAV. AND LOAN v. SunAmp Systems 838 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
SOUTHWEST SAV. AND LOAN v. SunAmp Systems 838 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
v. Henderson, -40 , -09 (1957) (insurance company may act in bad faith by refusing to settle litigation against insured).
Rogan v. Auto-Owners Insurance 832 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Rogan v. Auto-Owners Insurance 832 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
v. Henderson, , (insurer’s failure to terminate litigation in good faith by settlement renders it liable for full amount of judgment).
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Betancourt v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Fund 823 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(in deciding whether to settle, insurer must protect insured’s interest).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Superior Court 792 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1990
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Superior Court 792 P.2d 758 Ariz. 1990
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 792 P.2d 749 Ariz. 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
v. Henderson, , -06 (1957).
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
even though not specifically alleged in the complaint.
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
v. Henderson, , for determining whether an insurance company is guilty of bad faith in failing to settle third-party claims against its insured.
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1986
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1986
The early Arizona cases, Parsons v. Continental National American Group, supra, General Accident Fire & , , present typical third-party bad faith situations.
Equity General Insurance v. C & a Realty Co. 715 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Equity General Insurance v. C & a Realty Co. 715 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
v. Henderson, , *519 (1957); General Accident Fire &amp
Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy. 670 P.2d 725 Ariz. 1983
Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy. 670 P.2d 725 Ariz. 1983
Co., , -39 , (insurer must give equal consideration to both its own interests and the insured’s interests).
Brisco v. Meritplan Insurance 643 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Brisco v. Meritplan Insurance 643 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 613 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1980
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 613 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1980
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
General Accident Fire &amp
Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, Md 551 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, Md 551 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
General Accident Fire &amp
Parsons v. Continental National American Group 550 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1976
Parsons v. Continental National American Group 550 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1976
Fulton v. Woodford 545 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Fulton v. Woodford 545 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
As was stated in Farmers’ , : “It occurs to us that when the insurer is defending litigation against the insured, employs attorneys to represent the interests of both and has sole power and opportunity to make a settlement which would result in the protection of the insured against excess liability, common honesty demands th
Parsons v. Continental National American Group 535 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Parsons v. Continental National American Group 535 P.2d 17 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
A violator of this rule of equality of consideration cannot be said to have acted in good faith.” *604 -339

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by