Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McCluskey v. Sparks, 291 P.2d 791.

62 citing documents.

State Tax Commission v. Superior Court 450 P.2d 103 Ariz. 1969
taxpayers sued to enjoin the tax assessor and members of the County Board of Equalization from extending tax-, payers property on the tax roll.
Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
The appellants contend, as did the appellees in the Southern Pacific case, supra, , that the plaintiffs had an adequate remedy at law either under A.R.S.
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Drachman v. Jay 417 P.2d 704 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
“C. After payment of the tax, an action may be maintained to recover any tax illegally collected, and if the tax due is determined to be less than the amount paid, the excess shall be refunded in the manner provided by this chapter.” Plaintiffs’
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
where the complaint was of discrimination in assessment of properties as compared to other like properties in a county: “It is plain that when the issue to be tried is discrimination calling for proof of systematic and intentional disproportionate undervaluation, the appeal remedy prescribed by sectio
Board of Regents of the Universities & State College v. City of Tempe 356 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1960
Board of Regents of the Universities & State College v. City of Tempe 356 P.2d 399 Ariz. 1960
Thrift Hardware & , , 22 A.L.R.2d 810 ; , , 163 A.L.R.
In RE PETITION OF HAMM v. State 95 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1959
Sparks v. McCluskey 327 P.2d 295 Ariz. 1958
Sparks v. McCluskey 327 P.2d 295 Ariz. 1958

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by