Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Clark v. Tinnin, 304 P.2d 947.

30 citing documents.

Columbus Life Insurance v. Wilmington Trust Na Ariz. 2023
Columbus Life Insurance v. Wilmington Trust Na Ariz. 2023
See, Red Rover Copper v. Indus.
In THE ESTATE OF MARY A. RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES REILLY 266 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In THE ESTATE OF MARY A. RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES RILEY, AKA MARY AGNES REILLY 266 P.3d 1078 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-68, -54 (1934) (where illegality of contract appears on face of 3 contract or appears from evidence necessary to prove contract, court has duty to declare contract void); (waiver and estoppel cannot be invoked against void contract); cf. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins, 455 U.S. 72, 83 (1982) (federal court has duty to determine whether contract violates federal law before enforcing it).
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-64 , Red Rover Copper Co. v. Indus.
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(defense of waiver and estoppel cannot be invoked against an agreement which is void as against public policy).
Peterson v. Anderson 745 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Peterson v. Anderson 745 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Mathis v. Liquor Board 707 P.2d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Mathis v. Liquor Board 707 P.2d 974 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
White v. Mattox 619 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1980
White v. Mattox 619 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1980
Arizona State Liquor Board of Department of Liquor Licenses & Control v. Ali 550 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Arizona State Liquor Board of Department of Liquor Licenses & Control v. Ali 550 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Ong v. Abbott 394 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1964
Ong v. Abbott 394 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1964
prior to October 31, 1961 , .
Black v. Siler 392 P.2d 572 Ariz. 1964
Black v. Siler 392 P.2d 572 Ariz. 1964
Hooper v. Duncan 389 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1964
Hooper v. Duncan 389 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1964
Kalastro v. Duncan 366 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1961
Kalastro v. Duncan 366 P.2d 684 Ariz. 1961
Fio Rito v. Duncan 363 P.2d 69 Ariz. 1961
Fio Rito v. Duncan 363 P.2d 69 Ariz. 1961
Clark v. Tinnin, 1956, , .
Brand v. Elledge 360 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1961
Brand v. Elledge 360 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1961
Both the plaintiff and defendant cite prior decisions of this Court, namely, Clark v, Tinnin, , ; , ; , ; , .
Myerson v. Myerson 357 P.2d 133 Ariz. 1960
Myerson v. Myerson 357 P.2d 133 Ariz. 1960
We approve this court’s , , 949: “The general rule in the United States prohibits the holding or acquisition of a liquor license by one person in the interest of others as being contrary to public policy.