Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Swetnam v. FW Woolworth Company, 318 P.2d 364.

28 citing documents.

Alaniz v. Alaniz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Alaniz v. Alaniz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Woolworth Co., (“Any restraint, however slight, upon another’s liberty to come and go as one pleases, constitutes an arrest.”).
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Cullison v. City of Peoria 584 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1978
Cullison v. City of Peoria 584 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1978
Slade v. City of Phoenix, supra
Slade v. City of Phoenix 541 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1975
Slade v. City of Phoenix 541 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1975
State v. Hutton 505 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Hutton 505 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
see, State v. Vaughn, 12 Ariz.App.
State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren 498 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1972
State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren 498 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1972
168 , 4 L.Ed.2d 134 (1959); , State v. Vaughn, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Ramos 463 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Ramos 463 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Hill 461 P.2d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Hill 461 P.2d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Reeves v. ARIZONA AGGREGATE ASS'N HEALTH & WELF. F. 435 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1967
Reeves v. ARIZONA AGGREGATE ASS'N HEALTH & WELF. F. 435 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1967
Hinson v. Phoenix Pie Company 416 P.2d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Hinson v. Phoenix Pie Company 416 P.2d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Clark v. Compania Ganadera de Cananea, S.A., supra
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Cofhlin 412 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
actual restraint and a submission to the custody of the officers by the defendant.” , the Arizona Supreme Court, in reviewing the issue of false arrest and imprisonment, stated that “[a]ny restraint, however slight, upon another’s liberty to come and go as one pleases, constitutes an arrest.” In accordance with these pronouncements, and the facts as disclosed by the rec
Davidson v. Wee 379 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1963
Davidson v. Wee 379 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1963
Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff as we must, , the facts appear to be as follows: Plaintiff Davidson purchased from defendant’s supermarket a home permanent waving kit known as “Pin-it”, on December 27, 1957.
Boies v. Raynor 361 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1961
Boies v. Raynor 361 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1961
Wisniski v. Ong 329 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1958
Wisniski v. Ong 329 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1958
that the essence of false imprisonment is the direct restraint of personal liberty or freedom of locomotion, either by actual force or from the fear of force.