DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lucas, 708 P.2d 81.

57 citing documents.

  • State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    The superior court must provide a lesser- included offense instruction only when the absence of such an instruction “would fundamentally violate [the] defendant’s right to a fair trial” and “interferes with [the] defendant’s ability to conduct his defense.” -09 (1996).
  • State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Instead, the court has a duty to provide such an instruction only when its omission “would fundamentally violate [the] defendant’s right to a fair trial” and interfere with the “defendant’s ability to conduct his defense.” –08 (1996).
  • State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    Instead, the court has a duty to provide a lesser-included offense instruction only when the absence of such an instruction “would fundamentally violate [the] defendant’s right to a fair trial” and interfere with the defendant’s “ability to conduct h[er] defense.” –09 (1996).
  • State v. Brown 556 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Brown 556 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    See, (“unless failure to instruct the jury would fundamentally violate defendant’s right to a fair trial, the court is under no obligation to give the charge, absent a request”); (“generally the failure to give an instruction in the absence of a request for same is no
  • State v. Kristoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Kristoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Under such circumstances, “unless failure to instruct the jury would fundamentally violate defendant’s right to a fair trial, the court is under no obligation to give the charge, absent a request.” –08 (1996); see also Ariz. R. Crim.
  • State v. Hardisty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Hardisty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Azar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Instead, the court has a duty to provide a lesser-included offense instruction only when the absence of such an instruction “would fundamentally violate [the] defendant’s right to a fair trial” and interfere with the defendant’s “ability to conduct his defense.” –08 (1996).
  • State v. Kirby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Kirby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Garfield 92 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • State v. Garfield 92 P.3d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Blakley 65 P.3d 77 Ariz. 2003
  • State v. Griffin 58 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Griffin 58 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
  • State v. Green 29 P.3d 271 Ariz. 2001
  • State v. Green 29 P.3d 271 Ariz. 2001
    convictions become older they have increasingly less probative value on credibility.” , (citing to M. Udall & J. Livermore, Arizona Practice, Laws of Evidence § 47 at 90 (2nd ed.1982)).
  • State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
  • State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
    ¶ 15 Fundamental error occurs when the defendant loses a “right essential to his defense,” was unable to receive a fair trial, or where the error goes to the “very foundation of [defendant’s] theory of the case.” Gallegos, 178 Ariz. at 11 , 870 P.2d at 1107 ; -04 , -88 (1985) ( , ).
  • State v. Ives 927 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1996
  • State v. Ives 927 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1996
    1444 , 134 L.Ed.2d 564 (1996); -94 , -47 (1986); -02 , -86 (1985); -39 , -29 (App.1991).
  • State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
  • State v. Agee 887 P.2d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Agee 887 P.2d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
  • State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Belyeu 795 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Belyeu 795 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
  • State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 494 Ariz. 1988
  • Anderson v. State 746 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987