Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Muchmore v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 306 P.2d 272.
- Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 789 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
789 P.2d 401
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
We recognize that “where two inferences may be drawn, the commission is at liberty to choose either, and its conclusion will not be disturbed unless it is wholly unreasonable.” Muchmore v. Indus Comm’n, -52
- Adams v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1976
- Adams v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1976
- McNeely v. Industrial Commission 496 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- McNeely v. Industrial Commission 496 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Malone v. Industrial Commission 487 P.2d 404 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
Malone v. Industrial Commission
487 P.2d 404
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Application of Barrett, , Montgomery v. Industrial Commission, supra.
- Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission 482 P.2d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
Wyckoff v. Industrial Commission
482 P.2d 897
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
See: Application of Bar *290 rett, , , , .” 82 Ariz. at 133 , 309 P.2d at 259-260 .
- Esmeier v. Industrial Commission 459 P.2d 523 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
-
Esmeier v. Industrial Commission
459 P.2d 523
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
stated that some of the principles governing the review of Industrial Commission decisions are, (1) the burden of proving that the accident which resulted in injury or 'death arose out of and in the course of th
- Malinski v. Industrial Commission 439 P.2d 485 Ariz. 1968
-
Malinski v. Industrial Commission
439 P.2d 485
Ariz. 1968
This Court, , , stated: “Before attempting an analysis of the voluminous evidence adduced in a four-day hearing, which consists of 571 pages of reporter’s transcript, we deem it advisable to restate some of the principles governing such a review (they are so well established in this jurisdiction as to require no cita
- Arnott v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1968
- Arnott v. Industrial Commission 438 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1968
- Waller v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1965
- Waller v. Industrial Commission 406 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1965
- Eck v. Industrial Commission 405 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
-
Eck v. Industrial Commission
405 P.2d 296
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
“ * * * as trier of the facts it is the privilege and duty of the commission — and not of this court — to resolve all conflicts and draw warranted inferences; * * * where two inferences may be drawn, the commission is at liberty to choose either, and its con *508 elusion will not be disturbed unless it is wholly unreasonable; * * 352
- Wilson v. Wilson 399 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
- Wilson v. Wilson 399 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 392 P.2d 506 Ariz. 1964
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 392 P.2d 506 Ariz. 1964
- McCormick v. Industrial Commission 392 P.2d 299 Ariz. 1964
-
McCormick v. Industrial Commission
392 P.2d 299
Ariz. 1964
Much-more v. Industrial Commission, 81 Ariz.. 345
- Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co v. Industrial Commission 391 P.2d 589 Ariz. 1964
- Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co v. Industrial Commission 391 P.2d 589 Ariz. 1964
- Ireland v. Industrial Commission 370 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1962
-
Ireland v. Industrial Commission
370 P.2d 285
Ariz. 1962
“* * * [A]s trier of the facts it is the privilege and duty of the commission — and not of this court — to resolve all conflicts and draw warranted inferences * * * where two inferences may be drawn,, the commission is at liberty to choose either, arid its conclusion will not be disturbed unless it is wholly unreasonable * * *.” -52
- McGee v. San Manuel Copper Corporation 360 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1961
-
McGee v. San Manuel Copper Corporation
360 P.2d 1024
Ariz. 1961
See, e. g., Muchmore v. Industrial Commission, 81 * P.2d 272 ; , .
- Harrington v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 328 P.2d 311 Ariz. 1958
- Harrington v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 328 P.2d 311 Ariz. 1958
- Sheridan v. Industrial Commission 327 P.2d 90 Ariz. 1958
- Sheridan v. Industrial Commission 327 P.2d 90 Ariz. 1958
- Buick v. Industrial Commission 309 P.2d 257 Ariz. 1957
-
Buick v. Industrial Commission
309 P.2d 257
Ariz. 1957
See: Application of Barrett, , , , .