Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Holmes v. Graves, 318 P.2d 354.

62 citing documents.

Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Mabry 419 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Mabry 419 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Bartholomew v. Superior Court 417 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Bartholomew v. Superior Court 417 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
.” 97 Ariz. at p. 40 , 396 P.2d at p. 611 .
Nichols v. Elkins 408 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Nichols v. Elkins 408 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Cashion Gin Company v. Kulikov 399 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Cashion Gin Company v. Kulikov 399 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
the Court stated that there are three elements to an estoppel.
Decker v. Hendricks 396 P.2d 609 Ariz. 1964
Decker v. Hendricks 396 P.2d 609 Ariz. 1964
San Manuel Copper Corporation v. Farrell 362 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1961
San Manuel Copper Corporation v. Farrell 362 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1961
356: “Estoppel is quite generally predicated on conduct which induces another to acquiesce in a transaction, and that other, in reliance thereon, alters his position to his prejudice.