Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. Marvin, 317 P.2d 550.

142 citing documents.

Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
Campbell v. FRAZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 459 P.2d 300 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
we stated: “In determining whether a defendant should be relieved of a default judgment the court must be guided by equitable principles.
Del Castillo v. Harbour 445 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
Del Castillo v. Harbour 445 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
See, e. g., Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.
Hanen v. Willis 444 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Hanen v. Willis 444 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Treadaway v. Meador 436 P.2d 902 Ariz. 1968
Treadaway v. Meador 436 P.2d 902 Ariz. 1968
Camacho v. Gardner 435 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Camacho v. Gardner 435 P.2d 719 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Lawrence v. Burke 431 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
” The record before us does not disclose that each minor sustained injuries of substantially similar severity.
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fogel 429 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fogel 429 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Dart v. Valley National Bank 427 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Dart v. Valley National Bank 427 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc. 426 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1967
Goodman's Markets, Inc. v. Ward 421 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Goodman's Markets, Inc. v. Ward 421 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Hansen v. Brugliera 417 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Hansen v. Brugliera 417 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
The verified answer being an adequate showing of a meritorious defense, , a *37 search of the record shows no abuse of the discretion of the court below in granting defendant’s motion to set aside default and entry of judgment, and therefore the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.
C. Meisel Music Company v. Perl 415 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
C. Meisel Music Company v. Perl 415 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
by equitable principles: “These principles require that a defendant be given a fair opportunity to litigate a disputed obligation and also require that a plaintiff, who has, according to regular and legal proceedings, secured a judgment be protected against a violation of the rule which requires the sanctity'and the security of a valid judg- *482 níent.”
Kohlbeck v. Handley 415 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Kohlbeck v. Handley 415 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
“These principles require that a defendant be given a fair opportunity to litigate a disputed obligation and also require that a plaintiff, who has, according to regular and legal proceedings, secured a judgment be protected against a violation of the rule which requires the sanctity and security of a valid judgment.”
State Ex Rel. Husky v. Oaks 412 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Husky v. Oaks 412 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 409 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1965
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 409 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1965
Long v. Arizona Portland Cement Company 408 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Long v. Arizona Portland Cement Company 408 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 400 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co. 400 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. 397 P.2d 50 Ariz. 1964
Wilshire Mortgage Corp. v. Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. 397 P.2d 50 Ariz. 1964
we held that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to refuse a motion to set aside a default after a similar showing of neglect by the secretary in a law firm.
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
Gray v. Dillon 396 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1964
604 ; , ; Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc., , ; , ; , 179 P. 956 ; , 125 P. 873 .
Bateman v. McDonald 385 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1963
Bateman v. McDonald 385 P.2d 208 Ariz. 1963