Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stotts, 695 P.2d 1110.

98 citing documents.

State v. Wagner 976 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Wagner 976 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Guytan 968 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Guytan 968 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(absent abuse of discretion, sentence within statutory range not reversed).
State v. Rivers 945 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Rivers 945 P.2d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Portis 929 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Portis 929 P.2d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Sproule 937 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Sproule 937 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Fillmore 927 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Fillmore 927 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Baca 926 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Baca 926 P.2d 528 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Baum 893 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Baum 893 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
DISCUSSION A trial court may abuse its broad sentencing discretion by issuing a sentence *140 that demonstrates “arbitrariness, capriciousness, or failure to conduct an adequate investigation into the facts relevant to sentencing.” , ( , ).
State v. Walker 891 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Walker 891 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
803(6), 901(b)(7); -83 , -21 (1985).
State v. Robinson 869 P.2d 1196 Ariz. 1994
State v. Robinson 869 P.2d 1196 Ariz. 1994
(failure to provide probationer written conditions at time of probation renders probation unenforceable by revocation but hot invalid).
State v. Renner 868 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Renner 868 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Blanton 844 P.2d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Blanton 844 P.2d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
(a trial court’s decision admitting evidence will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion).
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Alves 851 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Alves 851 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Acosta, 25 Ariz.App.
Nieuwenhuis v. Kelly 795 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nieuwenhuis v. Kelly 795 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
797 , , and Green v. Superior Court, supra.
State v. Khoshbin 804 P.2d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Khoshbin 804 P.2d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
State v. Gourdin 751 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Gourdin 751 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Wilson 724 P.2d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Wilson 724 P.2d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Thurlow 712 P.2d 929 Ariz. 1986
State v. Thurlow 712 P.2d 929 Ariz. 1986
State v. Grier 707 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1985
State v. Grier 707 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1985
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Carvajal 709 P.2d 1366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rules 27.1, 27.7(c)(2); R.Crim.P.
State v. Cameron 704 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Cameron 704 P.2d 1355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985