Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite MacNeil v. Perkins, 324 P.2d 211.

104 citing documents.

Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
While it is axiomatic that the courts of Arizona will follow the application of the Restatement (Second) of Torts in the absence of authority to the contrary, , Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company, 24 Ariz.App.
Keck v. Jackson 593 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1979
Keck v. Jackson 593 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1979
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Radcliffe v. Hilton Inn 580 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Radcliffe v. Hilton Inn 580 P.2d 767 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Circle K Corp. v. Rosenthal 574 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Circle K Corp. v. Rosenthal 574 P.2d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 564 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1977
Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 564 P.2d 1227 Ariz. 1977
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company 537 P.2d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Company 537 P.2d 618 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Walker v. McClanahan 494 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Walker v. McClanahan 494 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Juengel 489 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Juengel 489 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Burrell v. Southern Pacific Company 474 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Burrell v. Southern Pacific Company 474 P.2d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
MacNeil v. Perkins, 1958, , ; Ingalls v. Neidlinger, 1950, , ; and State ex rel.
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Cor-num, , , 206 P. 1085 (1922); Crandall v. Consolidated Tel.
Norton v. Black 469 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Norton v. Black 469 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Giacona v. Tapley, 5 Ariz.App.
SPUR FEEDING COMPANY v. Fernandez 463 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
SPUR FEEDING COMPANY v. Fernandez 463 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hersey v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 458 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hersey v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 458 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Salt River Valley Water Users’ , ( , ).
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 454 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Rhodes v. El Rancho Markets 454 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Watson 436 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Watson 436 P.2d 175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
City of Phoenix v. Schroeder, 1 Ariz.App.
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Smith 431 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Smith 431 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc. 428 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1967
Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc. 428 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1967
Giacona v. Tapley 428 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Giacona v. Tapley 428 P.2d 439 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
the court extended the doctrine and held that it is not necessary that the condition which causes the harm attract the child onto the premises.
Morris v. Ortiz 415 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Morris v. Ortiz 415 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
181 , , Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Cornum
Marble v. Parham 416 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Marble v. Parham 416 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Dist., , Lee v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n
Porter v. Porter 416 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1966
O'Rielly Motor Company v. Rich 411 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
O'Rielly Motor Company v. Rich 411 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Cornum, , City of Phoenix v. Schroeder, 1 Ariz.App.
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Salinas v. Kahn 407 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Welker v. Kennecott Copper Company 403 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Welker v. Kennecott Copper Company 403 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
[1958], The plaintiff contends that under the evidence presented, there was a cause of action for jury determination presented under each of the following sections of the Restatement of Torts: “§ 413.