Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bowman v. Hall, 316 P.2d 484.

27 citing documents.

Water Works v. Jonas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Water Works v. Jonas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
State v. Jacobson 515 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1973
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Santanello v. Cooper 468 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
Camacho v. Gardner 456 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1969
179 P. 956 ; P.2d 484 .” The simultaneous attainment of these desiderata is obviously impossible.
State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Flores 454 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
However, , the Arizona Supreme Court held that while the trial court had wide discretion to reopen the case, it *506 was an abuse of that discretion to fail to open when plaintiff had to prove a missing link in a prima facie contract case; to wit, that the contract had in fact been fulfilled.
Cushman v. National Surety Corp. of New York 417 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Cushman v. National Surety Corp. of New York 417 P.2d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Klinger v. Conelly 407 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Klinger v. Conelly 407 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
Appellants cite us to Bowman v. Hall, 83 Ariz, 56, , in support of their position.
Puntel v. Kirtides 362 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1961
Puntel v. Kirtides 362 P.2d 737 Ariz. 1961
Rawls v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen Ins.
State v. Douglas 349 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1960
State v. Douglas 349 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1960
163 P. 264 ; , , 39 A.L.R.2d 979 ; , ; , .
Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. Marvin 317 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1957
Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. Marvin 317 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1957
179 P. 956 ; Bowman v. Hall, 83 Ariz.-, .