Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Rossi, 706 P.2d 371.

56 citing documents.

State v. Robledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Robledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(after completing fundamental error review, affirming conviction for attempted first-degree murder); ("[A]ttempted first degree murder can be knowingly committed and, as such, is an offense in Arizona."); (imp
State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
State v. Cropper 225 P.3d 579 Ariz. 2010
vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S. Ct. 2428 (2002)
State v. Wallace 191 P.3d 164 Ariz. 2008
State v. Wallace 191 P.3d 164 Ariz. 2008
a less violent means of murder was in some way “available.” The instruction did not require proof that the defendant intentionally chose one murder 3 In State v. Rossi, in finding a murder especially heinous and depraved, this Court noted that the defendant “used special bullets which he knew were designed to inflict greater tissue damage on a human body.”
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
State v. McCray 183 P.3d 503 Ariz. 2008
vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
State v. Smith 159 P.3d 531 Ariz. 2007
¶ 50, (citing State v. Rossi, 146 Ariz. 359, 366, ).
State v. Cromwell 119 P.3d 448 Ariz. 2005
State v. Cromwell 119 P.3d 448 Ariz. 2005
¶ 46, vacated on other grounds, Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
our supreme court also held that, because the trial court used “the wrong standard for determining and applying mitigating factors” in a capital case, the court had to vacate the sentence and remand for resentenc-ing.
State v. Smith 50 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2002
State v. Smith 50 P.3d 825 Ariz. 2002
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Finch 46 P.3d 421 Ariz. 2002
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
State v. Sansing 26 P.3d 1118 Ariz. 2001
1199 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1102 (2000); , , State v. Rossi
State v. Fillmore 927 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Fillmore 927 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
P. 32.6, 32.8, 17 A.R.S.; , (two elements of ineffective assistance); , (need to present colorable claim).
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ross 886 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1994
See also State v. Rossi -66 , -78 (1985) (after being shot, 66-year-old victim was helpless; he could not thwart the robbery and defendant easily could have escaped without firing fatal shot).
State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
Cf. State v. Rossi (Rossi I), , (defendant knew bullets were designed to inflict greater bodily damage).
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
1199 , 117 L.Ed.2d 439 (1992); Rossi, , .
State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
State v. Kiles 857 P.2d 1212 Ariz. 1993
State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
See State v. Rossi (Rossi II), , State v. Rossi (Rossi I)
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
for the sentencing judge to measure the relative weights of aggravating and mitigating circumstances does not make imposition of the death penalty arbitrary and irrational); , (right to voir dire trial judge concerning possible bias or prejudice is not encompassed within constitutional right to fair trial before impartial judge); , (prosecutor’s discretion to decide in which cases the death penalty will be sought does not make death penalty unconstitutional); , (jury has no right to determine ag
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
(Rossi I), the sentencing transcript demonstrated that the trial judge erroneously believed that defendant’s impairment under A.R.S.
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Rossi (Rossi I)
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
appeal after remand, , , cert.
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
State v. Rossi 741 P.2d 1223 Ariz. 1987
we affirmed appellant’s convictions for first-degree burglary, attempted first-degree murder, and first-degree murder.