Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bohannan v. Corporation Commission, 313 P.2d 379.

42 citing documents.

American Federation v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
American Federation v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
See Bohannan v. Corp. Comm’n, (“Uniform acquiescence of meaning, if it is not manifestly erroneous, will not be disturbed, at least in cases of doubt, for injustices are likely to result after a long period of time during which many rights will necessarily have been acquired.”).
Stambaugh v. Butler 379 P.3d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stambaugh v. Butler 379 P.3d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
ingsworth, , -29 , and when a contrary outcome would upset settled understandings, , (“Where there has been such a background of acquiescence in the meaning of a law unless manifestly erroneous, we will not disturb it.”); Bohannan v. Corp. Comm’n, , (“Uniform acquiescence of meaning, if it is not manifestly erroneous, will not be disturbed, at least in cases of doubt, for injustices are likely to result after a long period of time during which many rights will necessarily have been acquired.”);
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Bohannan v. Corp. Comm’n
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In Bohannon v. Corporation Comm’n, , our supreme court, in construing a constitutional provision and its companion statute being challenged for the first time in forty-five years, stated: Uniform acquiescence of meaning, if it is not manifestly erroneous, will not be disturbed, at least in eases of doubt, for injustices are likely
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Apache County 831 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct. 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
DEER VAL. UNIFIED SCH. D. v. Superior Ct. 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Superior Court 760 P.2d 537 Ariz. 1988
Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission 729 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission 729 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
accord Sutherland, supra, § 49.05.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632 712 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1986
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632 712 P.2d 431 Ariz. 1986
Dupnik v. MacDougall 664 P.2d 189 Ariz. 1983
Dupnik v. MacDougall 664 P.2d 189 Ariz. 1983
Swift & Company v. State Tax Commission 462 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1969
Swift & Company v. State Tax Commission 462 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1969
Baldwin v. Rohrer 459 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1969
Baldwin v. Rohrer 459 P.2d 309 Ariz. 1969
Bohannan v. Corporation *53 Commission, , ; Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, pp. 125— 127 (8th Ed.).
Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance Company 449 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1968
Industrial Commission v. Harbor Insurance Company 449 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1968
Hanks v. Borelli 411 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Hanks v. Borelli 411 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
19 Am.Jur.2d Corporations § 663.
Clark v. City of Tucson 403 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Clark v. City of Tucson 403 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Elfbrandt v. Russell 381 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1963
Elfbrandt v. Russell 381 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1963
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court 370 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1962
35 , ; Henrie v. Rocky Mountain Packing Corp., 113 Utah 415 , and the records of the constitutional convention, Ward v. Stevens, supra
Long v. Dick 347 P.2d 581 Ariz. 1959
Long v. Dick 347 P.2d 581 Ariz. 1959
Ward v. Stevens 344 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1959
Ward v. Stevens 344 P.2d 491 Ariz. 1959
Bolin v. Superior Court 333 P.2d 295 Ariz. 1958
Bolin v. Superior Court 333 P.2d 295 Ariz. 1958
214 P. 319 ; , ; 11 Am.Jur., Constitutional Law, §§ 78 and 80.
Peterson v. Flood 326 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1958
Peterson v. Flood 326 P.2d 845 Ariz. 1958