Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wray v. Superior Court, 308 P.2d 701.

26 citing documents.

Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow Memorial 410 P.3d 1223 Ariz. 2018
Butler Law v. Hon. higgins/winslow Memorial 410 P.3d 1223 Ariz. 2018
The statutory exceptions to the general venue rule are narrowly construed, and “courts will not enlarge or add to an express exception.”
Del E. Webb Cactus Development, Inc. v. Jessup 863 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Del E. Webb Cactus Development, Inc. v. Jessup 863 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
as authority for its decision to grant defendants’ motion for change of venue.
Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. Arizona Department of Administration 725 P.2d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. Arizona Department of Administration 725 P.2d 1127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Reilly v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY. 687 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Reilly v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY. 687 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Penunuri v. Superior Court 565 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Penunuri v. Superior Court 565 P.2d 905 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
The lower court, , and Wallen v. Jacobson, 18 Ariz.App.
Southwest Forest Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court 510 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Southwest Forest Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court 510 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Wallen v. Jacobson 504 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Wallen v. Jacobson 504 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
control the case sub judice.
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
our Supreme Court recognized that courts must refrain from enlarging or adding to the statutory exceptions embodied in A.R.S.
Albins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR YAVAPAI CTY. 438 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Albins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR YAVAPAI CTY. 438 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
* * *” When a proper request is made and not honored, the issue can be raised by prohibition as in Wray or by certiorari as in Massengill.
Massengill v. Superior Court 416 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Massengill v. Superior Court 416 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
wherein the trial judge declined to enter an order for a change of venue and the Supreme Court concluded its opinion by stating: “It is ordered that a peremptory writ of prohibition issue restraining respondents from further exercising jurisdiction over defendant Wray in said three civil actions
Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and Maricopa 409 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and Maricopa 409 P.2d 60 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Among these decisions are: , , , 70 A.L.R.2d 1336 (1959)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by