Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Timmons v. Industrial Commission, 316 P.2d 935.

32 citing documents.

Kwietkauski v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kwietkauski v. Sentry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 672 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 672 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1983
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Dean v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1976
Dean v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1976
See , Sproul v. Industrial Commission, supra
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lawler v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 1340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
In this case, petitioner had the burden of showing that his condition was not stationary, , or in the alternative, that he had sustained a permanent disability.
Diaz v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Diaz v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
quotes the Loyd Davis case with approval.
Davis v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Davis v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Jackson v. Industrial Commission 491 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Jackson v. Industrial Commission 491 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Lee v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Lee v. Industrial Commission 488 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Edwards v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Edwards v. Industrial Commission 484 P.2d 196 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
* * * Such, competent evidence must be in the record and cannot be furnished by data in the Commission’s files or by application of the doctrine of ‘judicial knowledge’ (Timmons v. Industrial Commission, supra, at pages 80-81, ).” 87 Ariz. at 66 , 347 P.2d at 717 .
Aragon v. Industrial Commission 481 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Aragon v. Industrial Commission 481 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Shroyer v. Industrial Commission 405 P.2d 875 Ariz. 1965
Shroyer v. Industrial Commission 405 P.2d 875 Ariz. 1965
-136 , -285 , , , 939 Examination of the instant case in the light of the above principles makes clear that the Commission erred in basing its award entirely upon the post-injury earnings.
Magma Copper Company v. Industrial Commission 395 P.2d 616 Ariz. 1964
Magma Copper Company v. Industrial Commission 395 P.2d 616 Ariz. 1964
In a similar case, , said: “No witnesses were called to show that petitioner could do any of these jobs; nor is there any competent evidence as to what a man in such a category could earn.
Scherer v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 349 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1960
Scherer v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 349 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1960
Allen v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1959
Allen v. Industrial Commission 347 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1959
When, however, the Commission does not make the required findings as to earning capacity or where such findings are not supported by competent evidence, this Court will, and on many occasions has, set aside the award (e. g.: , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , 2
Scott v. Industrial Commission 317 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1957
Scott v. Industrial Commission 317 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1957
This is a companion case to Timmons v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ariz. -, .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by