Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Overson v. Lynch, 317 P.2d 948.

29 citing documents.

Aller v. State Ariz. 2026
¶35 To prove his malicious prosecution claim, Aller must establish “(1) a criminal prosecution, (2) that terminate[d] in [his favor], (3) with defendants as prosecutors, (4) actuated by malice, (5) without probable cause, and (6) causing damages.” ().
Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
Joel Carson v. Hon. gentry/state Ariz. 2025
§ 1983 malicious prosecution claim); (explaining the elements of the state tort of malicious prosecution).
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Medrano v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶20 Under Arizona law, a malicious prosecution claim requires a plaintiff to allege and prove “(1) that there was a prosecution, (2) that it terminated in favor of plaintiff, (3) that defendants were prosecutors, (4) that they were actuated by malice, (5) that there was want of probable cause, and (6) the amount of damages sustained.”
Glaze v. Larsen 83 P.3d 26 Ariz. 2004
Glaze v. Larsen 83 P.3d 26 Ariz. 2004
See Overson v. Lynch, 83 Ariz. 158, 161
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1986
Frey v. Stoneman 722 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1986
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 674 (1965).
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bearup v. Bearup 596 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Bearup v. Bearup 596 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Cullison v. City of Peoria 584 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1978
Cullison v. City of Peoria 584 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1978
Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 557 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1976
Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 557 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1976
Babb v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 3 Cal.3d 841 , 92 Cal.Rptr.
Slade v. City of Phoenix 541 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1975
Slade v. City of Phoenix 541 P.2d 550 Ariz. 1975
Owen v. Shores 537 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Owen v. Shores 537 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hymer v. Moore 504 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Hymer v. Moore 504 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Todd v. Melcher 462 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Todd v. Melcher 462 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Patterson v. City of Phoenix 436 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1968
Patterson v. City of Phoenix 436 P.2d 613 Ariz. 1968
Lantay v. McLean 406 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Lantay v. McLean 406 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965