Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sturges v. Tongeland, 317 P.2d 941.

34 citing documents.

Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
.” In our review of the facts, heretofore, we find that there is conflict in the evidence as to what the parties thought a “ten per cent participation agreement” consisted of, and that there is reasonable
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 456 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Howard P. Foley Company v. Harris 456 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
.” Of course there are situations where we will not accept the findings of the trier of fact, such as where the record contains no evidence to support such findings, , 231 P
Dogarin v. Connor 433 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Dogarin v. Connor 433 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
On appeal, this court must construe all evidence favorably to uphold the judgment of the trial court, , , Bade v. Drachman, 4 Ariz.App.
Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin 420 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1966
Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin 420 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1966
Viliborghi v. Prescott School Dist.
Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Narramore 378 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. Narramore 378 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
Co., , ; , that: “ * * * In considering questions of this nature we have repeatedly laid down the following rules, that where the evidence is in conflict, we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court (citing cases) ; that evidence will be taken in the strongest manner in favor of the appe
Rossi v. Stewart 367 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1961
Holaway v. Realty Associates 367 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1961
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
Holaway v. Realty Associates 367 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1961
Bonine v. Bonine 367 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1961
down the following rules, that where the evidence is in conflict, we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court * * * that evidence will be taken in the strongest manner in favor of the appellee and in support of the court’s findings * * * and that r judgment will not be disturbed *321 when there is any reasonable evidence to support it * * -150 , .
Rossi v. Stewart 367 P.2d 242 Ariz. 1961
Viliborghi v. Prescott School Dist., etc.
Sulger v. Maslin 365 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1961
Sulger v. Maslin 365 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1961
Patzman v. Marshall 363 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1961
Patzman v. Marshall 363 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1961
Daru v. Martin, 89 Ariz. -, 363 P.2d.
Boies v. Raynor 361 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1961
Boies v. Raynor 361 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1961
we said: “ * * In considering questions of this nature we have repeatedly laid down the following rules, that where the evidence is in conflict, we will not substitute our opinion thereof for that of the trial court, (citing cases) ; that evidence will be taken in the strongest manner in favor of
Kellogg v. Bowen 337 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1959
Kellogg v. Bowen 337 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1959
Viliborghi v. Prescott School Dist No. 1, , .
Aircraft Instrument Corp. v. Craft 330 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1958
Aircraft Instrument Corp. v. Craft 330 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1958
County of Maricopa v. Shell Oil Company 327 P.2d 1005 Ariz. 1958
County of Maricopa v. Shell Oil Company 327 P.2d 1005 Ariz. 1958
Church v. Meredith 321 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1958
Church v. Meredith 321 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1958
Eldridge v. Jagger 317 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1957
Eldridge v. Jagger 317 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1957
In an opinion rendered November 12, 1957, , we reaffirmed the general rule set forth in Anderson v. Artesia Inv.