DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Correll, 715 P.2d 721.

153 citing documents.

  • State v. HERRERA, SR. 859 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1993
    (“Cruelty has been specifically defined to involve the infliction of pain on the victim[]____ [O]ur concept of cruelty involves not only physical pain, but also ‘mental * * * distress visited upon the victim[ ].’ ”) (citation omitted); , (“Cruelty can involve mental as well as physical suffering.
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
    -83 , -36 (1986) (mitigating circumstances considered individually and in combination).
  • State v. Downing 831 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Downing 831 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Noble 829 P.2d 1217 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Noble 829 P.2d 1217 Ariz. 1992
    See, -82 , -35 (1986) (applying analysis of Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
    1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991); -84 , -37 (1986) (denial of jury sentencing and defendant’s burden of proving mitigating evidence are not unconstitutional); , (restricting judge’s sentencing discretion is not unconstitutional); , 670
  • State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
    2290, 2298 , 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977); , citing Dobbert, 432 U.S. at 294 , 97 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
    -78 , -31 (1986) (defendant helped bind victims, drove them into desert, and encouraged actual killer to kill one victim).
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
    We have stated that “the killing and robbery need not occur simultaneously but the purpose of the killing must be to further the defendant’s motive of pecuniary gain from the robbery.” Walton, 159 Ariz. at 588 , 769 P.2d at 1034
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
    3200 , 105 L.Ed.2d 708 (1989)
  • State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
    See, , (killing own mother above the norm of first-degree murders); , (depravity indicated by senseless murders, unnecessary to the robbery; helplessness of bound and gagged victims shot one at a time with total disregard for human life).
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
    1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 ; -84 , -37 (1986) (jury trial not required for capital sentence); , (prosecutorial discretion upheld), cert.
  • State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
    -84 , -37 (1986) (finding of aggravating and mitigating circumstances by a jury is not constitutionally required); State v. Gretzler (Gretzler II), , , cert.
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
    See, e.g,, , (“especially heinous, cruel or depraved” aggravating circumstance not unconstitutionally vague); , (burden of proof on defendant for mitigating circumstances constitutional); -84 , -37 (1986) (jury trial not required for capital sentence); , (prosecutorial discretion upheld), cert.
  • State v. Robinson 796 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Robinson 796 P.2d 853 Ariz. 1990
    this court held that to establish this factor, the evidence must show that the hope of financial gain supplied the impetus for the murder.
  • State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
    2988 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1101 (1977) (death penalty is not cruel and unusual); -84 , -37 (1986) (denial of jury sentencing, burden of proving mitigation on the defendant, no *585 proof beyond a reasonable doubt that aggravation outweighs mitigation, and inadequate standards to weigh the factors are not unconstitutional)
  • State v. Crowder 747 P.2d 1176 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Crowder 747 P.2d 1176 Ariz. 1987
    796 , 66 L.Ed.2d 612 (1980); -81 , -34 (1986).
  • State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Jensen 735 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Jensen 735 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
    (defendant robbed home of victims, then took victims to desert where he shot and killed them; held that defendant “very carefully executed the armed robbery and the murders were part of the scheme of the robbery”).
  • State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986