Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Figueroa v. Majors, 338 P.2d 803.

59 citing documents.

Joseph v. Tibsherany 354 P.2d 254 Ariz. 1960
In treating defendant’s motion for judgment as a motion for directed verdict, this court has spoken on many occasions, , , 804: *210 “ * * * a motion for a directed verdict for the defendant admits the truth of whatever competent evidence the opposing party has introduced, including all inferences that reasonably can be drawn therefrom, and requires that the evidence be interpreted most strongly against the moving pa
Nieman v. Jacobs 347 P.2d 702 Ariz. 1959
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959
Golfinos v. Southern Pacific Company 345 P.2d 780 Ariz. 1959
Olsen v. MacY 340 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1959
Olsen v. MacY 340 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1959
Vickers v. Gercke 340 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1959
Vickers v. Gercke 340 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1959
The injury will have resulted, either from the fault of the employee alone, or will have been the result of unavoidable casualty, arising through no fault of either the employer or the employee.’ ” , , stated: “It is further fundamental that a verdict will not be directed where the evidence on material facts is conflicting, or where on undisputed facts reasonable and fair minded men may differ as to the inferences and conclusions to be drawn, or where different conclusions might reasonably be r
Southern Pacific Company v. Hendricks 339 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1959