Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. LaGrand, 734 P.2d 563.

152 citing documents.

State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
(“It is well established that no lesser included offense to felony murder exists because the mens rea necessary to satisfy the premeditation element of first degree murder is supplied by the specific intent required for the felony.”), cert.
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court 835 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court 835 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
Explained State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
The court made an analogy to cases in which murder was committed “to successfully complete or to get away with the robbery.” , , cert.
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
Walton, 159 Ariz. at 586 , 769 P.2d at 1032 ; , , cert.
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
“It is the effect of publicity on a juror’s objectivity that is critical, not the extent of publicity.” , , cert.
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
cert, denied, 484 U.S. 872 , 108 S.Ct.
State v. Jimenez 799 P.2d 785 Ariz. 1990
State v. Jimenez 799 P.2d 785 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Tucker 798 P.2d 1349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Tucker 798 P.2d 1349 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Mejias 789 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Mejias 789 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. McCutcheon 781 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1989
State v. McCutcheon 781 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
The question is “whether the sentences of death are excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and defendant.” , , cert.
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Bailey 772 P.2d 1130 Ariz. 1989
State v. Bailey 772 P.2d 1130 Ariz. 1989
State v. LaGrand (Walter), -30 , -72 , cert.
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
2347 , 85 L.Ed.2d 864 (1985); , , cert.
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Lopez 764 P.2d 1111 Ariz. 1988
State v. Lopez 764 P.2d 1111 Ariz. 1988
The trial court ruled the statements inadmissible without having the benefit of this court’s , , cert.
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
Contrary to defendant’s assertion, “[i]t is the effect of publicity on a juror’s objectivity that is critical, not the extent of publicity.” cert.
State v. Plew 745 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1987
State v. Plew 745 P.2d 102 Ariz. 1987
We do not believe that a judge should be able to bootstrap himself into the jury box via evidentiary rules.” State v. LaGrand (Walter)
State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
To prove this aggravating factor, the state “ ‘must show [that] the actor’s motivation was the expectation of pecuniary gain,’ ” so that gain was “ ‘a cause of the murder, not merely a result.’ ” State v. LaGrand [Walter], , (citations omitted; emphasis in original).