Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Williams, 698 P.2d 732.

57 citing documents.

Shepherd v. Fahringer 762 P.2d 553 Ariz. 1988
Also, the records are necessary to prove that the defendant had notice that his or her driver’s
State v. Johnston 731 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Johnston 731 P.2d 638 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Furthermore, in order to prove this element, the state must show “a ‘culpable mental state.’ The state must show that the driver knew or should have known that the license had been suspended.”
State v. Jennings 722 P.2d 258 Ariz. 1986
State v. Jennings 722 P.2d 258 Ariz. 1986
State v. Jennings 722 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Jennings 722 P.2d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
On April 30, 1985, , that it was error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury in a drunk-driving case that “the State must prove ‘that the defendant knew or should have known that his [driver’s] license was suspended or revoked.’ ” 144 Ariz. at 488 , 698 P.2d at 733 .