Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pima County v. Bilby, 351 P.2d 647.

71 citing documents.

Yoo Thun Lim v. Crespin 411 P.2d 809 Ariz. 1966
We will not dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with the rule, , , feeling that such a remedy is too harsh.
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
State v. Hollis 379 P.2d 750 Ariz. 1963
State v. Hollis 379 P.2d 750 Ariz. 1963
Fletcher v. State ex rel.
Rayburn v. State Ex Rel. Willey 378 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1963
Rayburn v. State Ex Rel. Willey 378 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1963
Appellant claims damages for loss of ingress and egress, , , and State ex rel.
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
In a civil case, where the plaintiff has the burden to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence, the trial court may properly grant a new trial provided that the ‘probative force of the evidence does not clearly preponderate in favor of the verdict.’ (Pima County v. Bilby, supra, , ).
Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
Caldwell v. Tremper 367 P.2d 266 Ariz. 1962
Fletcher v. State Ex Rel. Morrison 367 P.2d 272 Ariz. 1961
Fletcher v. State Ex Rel. Morrison 367 P.2d 272 Ariz. 1961
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Griggs 358 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1960
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Griggs 358 P.2d 174 Ariz. 1960
see also James v. City of Greenville, 227 S.C.
State v. Bogard 354 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1960
State v. Bogard 354 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1960
Blakely Oil, , ; , ; , ; , .
State v. Saenz 353 P.2d 1026 Ariz. 1960
State v. Saenz 353 P.2d 1026 Ariz. 1960
The rules applicable to review of a , .
State v. McDonald 352 P.2d 343 Ariz. 1960
State v. McDonald 352 P.2d 343 Ariz. 1960
Morrison v. Thelberg (second opinion), 87 Ariz 318, , and Pima County v. Bilby, *13 87 Ariz. -, .