Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State Board of Technical Registration v. McDaniel, 326 P.2d 348.
- Schecter v. Killingsworth 380 P.2d 136 Ariz. 1963
- Rhodes v. Clark 373 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1962
- Rhodes v. Clark 373 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1962
- City of Phoenix v. Kelly 366 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1961
-
City of Phoenix v. Kelly
366 P.2d 470
Ariz. 1961
1549 (1929) this court observed, that: “ * * * the statute must be construed as a whole, effect being given, if possible, to all its provisions.”
- Senner v. Bank of Douglas 354 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1960
-
Senner v. Bank of Douglas
354 P.2d 48
Ariz. 1960
Title 12, Chapter 7, Article 6, § 12-901 et seq.), which have been held not *200 to be “in all cases, the exclusive and an adequate remedy” ( , ) (emphasis in original).
- Forman v. Creighton School District No. 14 351 P.2d 165 Ariz. 1960
-
Forman v. Creighton School District No. 14
351 P.2d 165
Ariz. 1960
we said: “The law is well settled in this jurisdiction that every legislative Act is presumed to be constitutional and every intendment must be indulged in by courts in favor of validity of such Acts.
- State v. Beadle 326 P.2d 344 Ariz. 1958
- State Board of Technical Registration v. Bauer 326 P.2d 358 Ariz. 1958
- State Board of Technical Registration v. Bauer 326 P.2d 358 Ariz. 1958
-
State v. Beadle
326 P.2d 344
Ariz. 1958
section 32-144 or section 67— 1818, A.C.A.” This is a , , and State Board of Technical Registration v. Bauer, 84 * P.2d 358 (hereinafter referred to as McDaniel or Bauer).