DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Application of Williams, 333 P.2d 280.

34 citing documents.

  • Brailsford v. Foster 393 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Brailsford v. Foster 393 P.3d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Ebert 964 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
  • State v. Ebert 964 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
    anyone who voluntarily took part in “the rebellion;” waiver applied “in cases where the objection does not go to the subversion of all the proceedings taken in impaneling and swearing the grand jury, but relates only to the qualification or disqualification of certain persons sworn upon the jury or excluded therefrom, or to mere irregularities in constituting the panel”); Application of Williams, , (finding waiver when no timely objection made to fact that too few potential jurors drawn, sworn a
  • State v. Prince 689 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Prince 689 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    Application of Williams, , State v. Thompson, supra .
  • State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
  • State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
    See the 1956 Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended, Rule 32(A); , Application of Williams, , , ” Under Rule 16.5, Rules of Criminal Procedure, a prosecutor, upon a showing of good cause, may move to dismiss a prosecution at any time.
  • State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
    Application of Williams, , Westover v. State, 66 Ariz. *284 145
  • State v. Ramos 492 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Ramos 492 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1972
  • Yavapai County Attorney v. Mahoney 491 P.2d 469 Ariz. 1971
  • Yavapai County Attorney v. Mahoney 491 P.2d 469 Ariz. 1971
  • In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
  • In Re Anonymous, Juvenile Court No. 6358-4 484 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
  • State v. Altman 482 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Altman 482 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Brady 461 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Terrell 445 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1968
  • State v. Terrell 445 P.2d 429 Ariz. 1968
    Volume 17, states that: “The magistrate, if he holds the defendant to answer, shall enter an order in his docket to the following effect: ‘It appearing to me that the crime of (stating generally the nature, and as nearly as may be the time and place where the crime was committed) * * *(Emphasis supplied) In application of Williams, , , quoted with approval in Dodd *455 v. Boies, , , we said: “However, in a charge as grave as that of first degree murder, it would seem that a magistrate conducting
  • State v. Brock 416 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1966
  • State v. Brock 416 P.2d 601 Ariz. 1966
    Application of Williams, , .
  • State v. Burruell 401 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Burruell 401 P.2d 733 Ariz. 1965
    Ap *40 plication of Williams
  • State v. Schroeder 389 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1964
  • State v. Schroeder 389 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1964
  • State v. Puckett 377 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1963
  • State v. Puckett 377 P.2d 779 Ariz. 1963
  • Dodd v. Boies 357 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1960
  • Dodd v. Boies 357 P.2d 144 Ariz. 1960
    nt, or determine the degree of the crime charged, but only to determine whether there is probable cause to believe defendant guilty of the offense charged, and leave to the trial tribunal the final determination of the application of the law to the facts and leave to the jury the question as to whether defendant is guilty of the offense charged or of an included offense.” Application of Williams, -118 , -286 .