Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Daru v. Martin, 363 P.2d 61.

47 citing documents.

Anderson v. Contes 128 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Anderson v. Contes 128 P.3d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
We caution, however, that "a successor judge is in no position to pass on the credibility of witnesses whom he has not seen.”
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes 97 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(“Despite the common assumption that presentation of argument is a right, it is not one of an absolute nature except where expressly made so by constitutional or statutory provision.”).
State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
& Loan Ass’n, , , (jury argument is subject to reasonable regulation).
Davis v. Davis 985 P.2d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Davis v. Davis 985 P.2d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Copeland v. City of Yuma 772 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Copeland v. City of Yuma 772 P.2d 1160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
where the whole subject has been fully developed by other evidence.”
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Goodrich 726 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
See Rule 42(c), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
Sparks v. Republic National Life Insurance 647 P.2d 1127 Ariz. 1982
DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co. 592 P.2d 759 Ariz. 1979
DeElena v. Southern Pacific Co. 592 P.2d 759 Ariz. 1979
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
State v. Valenzuela 567 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1977
State v. Valenzuela 567 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Wiesel v. Ashcraft 549 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Wiesel v. Ashcraft 549 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Gertz v. Selin 544 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1976
Gertz v. Selin 544 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1976
Gibson v. W. D. Parker Trust, 22 Ariz.App.
Gibson v. W.D. Parker Trust 527 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Gibson v. W.D. Parker Trust 527 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Additionally, they point out that the principal may be es-topped to deny the agent’s authority where he has allowed others to detrimentally rely on the apparent authority of the agent
Holsclaw v. Catalina Savings & Loan Association 476 P.2d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Holsclaw v. Catalina Savings & Loan Association 476 P.2d 883 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
See Land-Air, , and cases cited; -381 , ; Canyon State Canners, -73 , -1025 (1952).
In Re Estate of Wiswall 464 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
In Re Estate of Wiswall 464 P.2d 634 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
210 P. 683 (1922) ; , ; , ; Miller v. Boeger, 1 Ariz.App.
Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Goldbaum v. Bloomfield Building Industries, Inc. 459 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
.” In our review of the facts, heretofore, we find that there is conflict in the evidence as to what the parties thought a “ten per cent participation agreement” consisted of, and that there is reasonable evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings that the alleged contract of participat
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
Tri-State Insurance Company v. Maxwell 457 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1969
.” Of course there are situations where we will not accept the findings of the trier of fact, such as where the record contains no evidence to support such findings, , , or where a detailed examination of the evidence convinces this .Court that a reasonable and
Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 456 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1969
Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n 456 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1969
Nutter v. Bechtel 433 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Nutter v. Bechtel 433 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Miller v. Boeger 405 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Miller v. Boeger 405 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company 401 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Graham v. Vegetable Oil Products Company 401 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Nordale v. Fisher 380 P.2d 1003 Ariz. 1963
Nordale v. Fisher 380 P.2d 1003 Ariz. 1963
Patzman v. Marshall 363 P.2d 599 Ariz. 1961