Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dean v. Superior Court, 324 P.2d 764.

69 citing documents.

Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company 431 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1966
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court 418 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1966
A writ of prohibition is appropriate “to prevent an inferior court from acting without or in excess of jurisdiction, where wrong, damage and injustice are likely to follow and there is no plain, speedy and adequate remedy available.” , , 73 A.L.R.2d 1 ; , ; , .
Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 412 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1966
Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima 412 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1966
73 A.L.R.2d 1 ; State ex rel.
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 410 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1966
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 410 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1966
Phoenix General Hospital v. Superior Court 402 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Phoenix General Hospital v. Superior Court 402 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
73 A.L.R.2d 1 (1958), , and respondents further rely upon A.R.S.
Zimmerman v. Superior Court 402 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1965
Zimmerman v. Superior Court 402 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1965
State Farm Insurance Company v. Roberts 398 P.2d 671 Ariz. 1965
State Farm Insurance Company v. Roberts 398 P.2d 671 Ariz. 1965
With reference to the production of the statement by means of a motion under Rule 34, , , 73 A.L.R.2d 1 , is controlling.
Industrial Commission v. Holohan 397 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1964
Industrial Commission v. Holohan 397 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1964
73 A.L.R.2d 1 , Rule 34 was discussed at length.
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Whitman 370 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1962
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Whitman 370 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1962
Watts v. Superior Court 347 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1959
Watts v. Superior Court 347 P.2d 565 Ariz. 1959
Dean, v. Superior Court, , .