Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hansen, 751 P.2d 951.

96 citing documents.

State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(mistrial); , (new trial).
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lee 944 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1997
-34 , -38 (1989); , (stating that trial court is in better position to judge effect of prosecutor’s comments on jury) ( , ).
Miller v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Miller v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. Geotis 930 P.2d 1324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Geotis 930 P.2d 1324 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
A defendant is entitled to a Willits instruction where “(1) the state failed to preserve accessible material evidence that might have been exculpatory, and (2) there was resulting prej *525 udice.” Lang, 176 Ariz. at 484 , 862 P.2d at 244 ( , ).
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
State v. Spears 908 P.2d 1062 Ariz. 1996
When a defendant alleges that jurors have considered facts not properly in evidence, “the trial court must grant a new trial if it cannot find beyond a reasonable doubt that the extrinsic evidence did not contribute to the verdict.”
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Williams 898 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Smith 893 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Smith 893 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Henry 863 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1993
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
While the granting of a motion to dismiss is within the sound discretion of the trial court, , when there has been an abuse of discretion, this court has a duty to reverse.
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
-97 , -57 (1988) (citation omitted).
State v. Cornell 845 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Cornell 845 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Boston 823 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Boston 823 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Anaya 825 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Anaya 825 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Stuart 811 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Stuart 811 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
{Willits instruction upon proof that (1) the state failed to preserve material evidence that was accessible and might have tended to exonerate the defendant, and (2) prejudice resulted).
State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
State v. Dumaine 783 P.2d 1184 Ariz. 1989
State v. Barrios 781 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Barrios 781 P.2d 624 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Gerhardt 778 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Gerhardt 778 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
579 2d 65, 67 (App.1978).