Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Anway, 349 P.2d 774.

74 citing documents.

State v. Sepahi 78 P.3d 732 Ariz. 2003
State v. Sepahi 78 P.3d 732 Ariz. 2003
Morrison v. Anway, 87 Ariz. 206, 209
Calik v. Superior Court 979 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Calik v. Superior Court 979 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
(“It is a universal rule that courts will not enlarge, stretch, expand, or extend a statute to matters not falling within its express provisions.”).
Caretto v. Arizona Department of Transportation 965 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Caretto v. Arizona Department of Transportation 965 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(holding that courts will not stretch a statute to matters not falling within its express provisions).
Aikins v. ARIZ. DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES 743 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Aikins v. ARIZ. DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES 743 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott 638 P.2d 1324 Ariz. 1981
Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott 638 P.2d 1324 Ariz. 1981
Farmers Investment Co. v. Pima Mining Co. 523 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1974
Farmers Investment Co. v. Pima Mining Co. 523 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1974
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bohannan 421 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1966
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bohannan 421 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1966
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Harpham 410 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Lassen v. Harpham 410 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
City of Phoenix v. Donofrio 407 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1965
City of Phoenix v. Donofrio 407 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1965
Town of Scottsdale v. State 405 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1965
Town of Scottsdale v. State 405 P.2d 871 Ariz. 1965
Finn v. J. H. Rose Truck Lines 398 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Finn v. J. H. Rose Truck Lines 398 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965