Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Galbraith v. Galbraith, 356 P.2d 1023.

49 citing documents.

Boozer v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Boozer v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(noting that “a showing of changed circumstances affecting the welfare of the child” is “a condition precedent to the modification of the custody provisions” of “a divorce judgment”).
In re the Marriage of Friedman 397 P.3d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Wild v. Wild Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Wild v. Wild Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Santillan v. Keeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Santillan v. Keeney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Simpson v. Simpson 229 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Simpson v. Simpson 229 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Matter of Guardianship of Cruz 741 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Matter of Guardianship of Cruz 741 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
§ 14-5206; , In re Farson’s Estate, , , 184 P. 1005 (1919); In re Thelen’s Estate, 9 Ariz.App.
Hindsley v. Hindsley 701 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Hindsley v. Hindsley 701 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
the order was arbitrary and capricious in its finding that the mother “ha[d] not cooperated in the intent of the joint custody agreement in allowing liberal visitation and in cooperating in visitation” since the custody decree did not refer to “liberal visitation.”
Smith v. Smith 571 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Smith v. Smith 571 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Georgia v. Georgia, 27 Ariz.App.
Black v. Black 560 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1977
Black v. Black 560 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1977
Hunt v. Hunt 529 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Hunt v. Hunt 529 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Porter v. Porter 518 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Porter v. Porter 518 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Orezza v. Ramirez 507 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Orezza v. Ramirez 507 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Stapley v. Stapley 485 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Stapley v. Stapley 485 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Shaffer v. Shaffer, 61 Wash.2d 699
Wise v. Wise 481 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Wise v. Wise 481 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Johnson v. Johnson 479 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Johnson 479 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Armer v. Armer 463 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1970
Armer v. Armer 463 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1970
Earley v. Earley 458 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Earley v. Earley 458 P.2d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Hoffman v. Hoffman 417 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Hoffman v. Hoffman 417 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
modified as to other matters on rehearing
Reardon v. Reardon 415 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Reardon v. Reardon 415 P.2d 571 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
The trial judge is in the best position to determine what is best for the children and unless it clearly appears that he has mistaken or ignored the evidence, this court will not disturb his decision.” at 362 , at 1026 (1960).
Borg v. Borg 413 P.2d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Borg v. Borg 413 P.2d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
In Re Guardianship of Rodgers 413 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1966
In Re Guardianship of Rodgers 413 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1966
Bailey v. Bailey 412 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Bailey v. Bailey 412 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
modified as to other matters on rehearing
Bergman v. Bergman 401 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Bergman v. Bergman 401 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
Smith v. Smith 367 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1961
Smith v. Smith 367 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1961
Henning v. Henning 362 P.2d 124 Ariz. 1961
Henning v. Henning 362 P.2d 124 Ariz. 1961