Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thelberg, 350 P.2d 988.

90 citing documents.

State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. 2025
State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. 2025
(describing a positive easement as “a property right”); S. Cal.
State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Az Electric Power v. Djl 2007 443 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Az Electric Power v. Djl 2007 443 P.3d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
see also A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control Dist.
City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
City of Phoenix v. John E. Garretson 322 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2014
Morrison v. Thelberg, the landowners’ property abutted a conventional highway that the state converted to a controlled- access highway with a slightly raised frontage road.1 –90 (1960).
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
City of Phoenix v. Garretson 302 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Orsett/Columbia Ltd. Partnership v. Superior Court 83 P.3d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Orsett/Columbia Ltd. Partnership v. Superior Court 83 P.3d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-24 , -92 (1960) (holding that a property owner whose right of access to a highway is damaged or destroyed is entitled to just compensation), its interpretation of § 12-1113 has not been overruled and it continues to be cited as the authoritative case.
Duwa, Inc. v. City of Tempe 52 P.3d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Duwa, Inc. v. City of Tempe 52 P.3d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
City of Phoenix v. Wilson 21 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2001
City of Phoenix v. Wilson 21 P.3d 388 Ariz. 2001
); see also Jay Six Cattle Co., Inc., 88 Ariz. at 107 , 353 P.2d at 192 .
Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State 16 P.3d 757 Ariz. 2001
Clouse v. State 11 P.3d 1012 Ariz. 2000
Airport Properties v. Maricopa County 985 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Airport Properties v. Maricopa County 985 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
De Alfy Properties v. Pima County 985 P.2d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
De Alfy Properties v. Pima County 985 P.2d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp. 566 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1997
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Peruskov 800 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 644 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1982
City of Yuma v. Lattie 572 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
City of Yuma v. Lattie 572 P.2d 108 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In support of this contention
State ex rel. Herman v. Cardon 530 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State ex rel. Herman v. Cardon 530 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents, 9 Ariz.App.
State Tax Commission v. Marcus J. Lawrence Memorial Hospital 485 P.2d 277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Tax Commission v. Marcus J. Lawrence Memorial Hospital 485 P.2d 277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
discussed the definition of property as follows: “ ‘Property is entirely the creature of the law.
American Savings Life Insurance v. State ex rel. Herman 476 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
American Savings Life Insurance v. State ex rel. Herman 476 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc. 472 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
City of Phoenix v. Collar, Williams & White Engineering, Inc. 472 P.2d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 467 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Schaffer 467 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1970
Lehman v. Iowa State Highway Commission, 251 Iowa 77 , 99 N.W.2d 404 .
Caruth v. Mariani 463 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Caruth v. Mariani 463 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
and that the instant case cannot be distinguished from it in any substantive way.
Schock v. Jacka 460 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1969
Schock v. Jacka 460 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1969
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents 453 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Uvodich v. Arizona Board of Regents 453 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Moschetti v. City of Tucson 449 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Moschetti v. City of Tucson 449 P.2d 945 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by