Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Dansby v. Buck, 373 P.2d 1.

40 citing documents.

Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Distinguished Thomas v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. Laos 326 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
not “reap the benefit of a settlement to which [they were] not a party.” McConal Aviation, (“‘It has always been the policy of [Arizona] law to favor compromise and settlement; and it is especially important to sustain that principle in this age of voluminous litigation.’”)
Yollin v. City of Glendale 191 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Yollin v. City of Glendale 191 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
(“It has always been the policy of the law to favor compromise and settlement; and it is especially important to sustain that principle in this age of voluminous litigation.”) (quoted in Emmons v. Super.
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of America 36 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
and settlement of disputes
Emmons v. Superior Court 968 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Emmons v. Superior Court 968 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Our supreme court stated in Dansby v. Buck that “[i]t has always been the policy of the law to favor compromise and settlement; and it is especially important to sustain that principle in this age of voluminous litigation____”
Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP 919 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP 919 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
“It has always been the policy of the law to favor compromise and settlement----” , , (settlement of litigation is favored).
Dietz v. Lopez 879 P.2d 2 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Dietz v. Lopez 879 P.2d 2 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc. 792 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc. 792 P.2d 765 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Parrish v. United Bank of Arizona 790 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Parrish v. United Bank of Arizona 790 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Dutton v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 784 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dutton v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 784 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
a personal injury action in which the supreme court concluded that a general release would preclude a claim for a previously undiscovered physical condition only if the parties contemplated, and the releasor assumed, the risk of unknown conditions.
Love v. Home Transportation Co. 641 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Love v. Home Transportation Co. 641 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Shelton v. Grubbs 568 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Shelton v. Grubbs 568 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
*231 , it was stated: “It has always been the policy of the law to favor compromise and settlement; and it is especially important to sustain that principle in this age of voluminous litigation.
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
Gray v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Gray v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hendricks v. Simper 539 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hendricks v. Simper 539 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
because it was based on a mutual or unilateral mistake of the parties.
Jeffries v. Gillitzer 225 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
Schmidt v. Smith 216 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1974
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Mestas 469 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Mestas 469 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Milhous v. State Highway Dept., 194 S.C.
Melvin v. Stevens 458 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Melvin v. Stevens 458 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Mofford v. Industrial Commission 443 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Mofford v. Industrial Commission 443 P.2d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Hoopes v. Lamb 429 P.2d 447 Ariz. 1967
Hoopes v. Lamb 429 P.2d 447 Ariz. 1967
we set forth the general rules governing the rescission of releases.