DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., 366 P.2d 1.

39 citing documents.

  • State Bar v. Papa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State Bar v. Papa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Co., (“[T]hose acts, whether performed in court or in the law office, which lawyers customarily have carried on from day to day through the centuries must constitute ‘the practice of law.’”).
  • State Bar v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State Bar v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Co., (“[T]hose acts, whether performed in court or in the law office, which lawyers customarily have carried on from day to day through the centuries must constitute ‘the practice of law.’”).
  • Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
  • Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court 120 P.3d 1092 Ariz. 2005
    v¢ Ariz. Land Title & Trust Co., P.2d 1 (1961); P. 376 (l926); P. 29 {1926).
  • Romley v. Arpaio 40 P.3d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • Romley v. Arpaio 40 P.3d 831 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
    See State Bar of Ariz. v. Ariz. Land Title & Trust Co., , (holding representation of another in administrative hearing constitutes practice of law).
  • Encinas v. Mangum 54 P.3d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • Encinas v. Mangum 54 P.3d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
    State Bar of Ariz. v. Ariz. Land Title & Trust Co.
  • Byers-Watts v. Parker 18 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
  • Byers-Watts v. Parker 18 P.3d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
    representing another before a court____”) (quoting State Bar of Ariz. v. Ariz. Land Title & Trust Co., , ).
  • In Re Creasy 12 P.3d 214 Ariz. 2000
  • In Re Creasy 12 P.3d 214 Ariz. 2000
    include rendering to another any other advice or services which are and have been customarily given and performed from day to day in the ordinary *542 practice of members of the legal profession— State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., , (emphasis added).
  • In Re Estate of Shumway 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
  • In Re Estate of Shumway 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
    modified on other grounds
  • Rodriguez v. Gavette 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
  • Rodriguez v. Gavette 3 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
    either with or without compensation.” , modified on other grounds
  • Matter of Fleischman 933 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1997
  • Matter of Fleischman 933 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1997
    The practice of law consists of “those acts, whether performed in court or in the law office, which lawyers customarily have carried on from day to day through the centuries____” State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., , modified on other grounds
  • In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
  • In Re Shannon 876 P.2d 548 Ariz. 1994
    State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., , see Hunt, 127 Ariz. at 262 , 619 P.2d at 1039 (listing cases from numerous jurisdictions recognizing judiciary’s authority to regulate and control practice of law); see generally Blewett Lee, The Constitutional Power of the Courts Over Admission to the Bar.; 18 Harv.L.Rev.
  • Peterson v. Anderson 745 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • Peterson v. Anderson 745 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
    State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.
  • Matter of Swartz 686 P.2d 1236 Ariz. 1984
  • Matter of Swartz 686 P.2d 1236 Ariz. 1984
  • Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission 619 P.2d 1036 Ariz. 1980
  • Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System Commission 619 P.2d 1036 Ariz. 1980
    244 P. 376 (1926); , 248 P. 29 (1926); State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.
  • Certified Collectors, Inc. v. Lesnick 570 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1977
  • Certified Collectors, Inc. v. Lesnick 570 P.2d 769 Ariz. 1977
    The parties and amicus have cited the following cases on the issue: State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., , modified , State ex rel.
  • Morley v. J. Pagel Realty & Insurance 550 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
  • Morley v. J. Pagel Realty & Insurance 550 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
    In State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co., , supplemented, , our Supreme Court gave the following general definition: “ .
  • Florez v. City of Glendale 463 P.2d 67 Ariz. 1969
  • Florez v. City of Glendale 463 P.2d 67 Ariz. 1969
    This Court, , indicated that the practice of law in Arizona is confined to those who have been duly licensed as attorneys.
  • Hackin v. State 427 P.2d 910 Ariz. 1967
  • Hackin v. State 427 P.2d 910 Ariz. 1967
    we devoted much attention to the definition of the practice of law.
  • Quirk v. Industrial Commission 412 P.2d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
  • Quirk v. Industrial Commission 412 P.2d 81 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
    Subsection A states in part: “ * * * The physician shall inform the injured employee of his rights under this chapter and shall give all necessary assistance in making the application for compensation and such proof as required by the rules of the commission without charge.” *89 , supplemental opinion, , we question the validity of this burden cast upon the medical profession.
  • Peterson v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District 391 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1964