Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Allen v. Industrial Commission, 347 P.2d 710.

102 citing documents.

Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 10 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 10 P.3d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
The trial court granted Yauch’s motion, , , and that “Arizona law concerning the measure of loss of earning capacity is not inconsistent with federal substantive law interpreting the FELA.” The trial court also precluded any evidence of SP’s willingness to have Y
Rent a Center v. Industrial Commission 956 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Rent a Center v. Industrial Commission 956 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Cohn v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Cohn v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
See Allen v. Industrial Comm’n, , We therefore must determine whether the administrative law judge improperly prohibited claimant from pursuing an inquiry into the grounds for termination.
Kinnard v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Doles v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 810 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Doles v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 810 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Allen v. Industrial Comm’n
Arden-Mayfair v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Arden-Mayfair v. Industrial Commission 764 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ. 692 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1203 Ariz. 1984
Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 680 P.2d 1203 Ariz. 1984
The Industrial Commission is not in an adversarial relationship with claimants
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Laker v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 679 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
2 A. Larson Workmen's Compensation Law § 57.21 (1980).
MacIas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 677 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1984
MacIas v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 677 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1984
Roach, supra 137 Ariz. at 512 , 672 P.2d at 177 ; , -500 , -53 (1973).
Roach v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 672 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1983
Roach v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 672 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1983
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 656 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1982
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
Cook v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 651 P.2d 365 Ariz. 1982
Fullen v. Industrial Commission 595 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1979
Fullen v. Industrial Commission 595 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1979
admonished the Commission that proceedings before it are not adversary proceedings and that it is as much the duty of the Commission to encourage and evaluate proper claims fairly as it is to expose and reject improper claims.
Evertsen v. Industrial Commission 573 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Evertsen v. Industrial Commission 573 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Because of the apparent conflict in these roles, , : “Nor do we consider the role of the Commission to be that strictly of an adversary at a proceeding in which it acts also in a judicial capacity, especially when the employee, as here, does not appear before it represented by counsel.” Id.
Gould v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Gould v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Gould also claims that the evidence shows that his current employer is paying him somewhat out of sympathy and that we should therefore discount the value of the wage with this factor, , second appeal
Dean v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Dean v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Diaz, 19 Ariz.App.
Dye v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
La Rue v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
La Rue v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Cramer v. Industrial Commission 507 P.2d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Cramer v. Industrial Commission 507 P.2d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Cameron v. Industrial Commission 498 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Cameron v. Industrial Commission 498 P.2d 163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
the Commission owed a duty to the injured workman.
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 493 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Sutton v. Industrial Commission 493 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Turley v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App.