Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Gilbert v. Quinet, 369 P.2d 267.

61 citing documents.

Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Worthington v. Funk 442 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Since it appears to be a , we set it forth: “A person who, without negligence on his part, is suddenly and unexpectedly confronted with peril arising from either the actual presence or the appearance of imminent danger to himself or to others is not expected nor required to use the *597 •same judgment and prudence that is
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Wilson 420 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Wilson 420 P.2d 992 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
He must, however, base his opinion only upon competent evidence.” (Emphasis added) , In Gilbert , our Supreme Court recognized by note 1 of its opinion, which immediately followed the above quotation, that there was an exception in the case of a physician disclosing the history related to him by his patient.
Simpson v. Heiderich 419 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Schmidt v. Gibbons 418 P.2d 378 Ariz. 1966
Schmidt v. Gibbons 418 P.2d 378 Ariz. 1966
Bogard GMC Co. v. Henley, 2 Ariz.App.
Bogard GMC Co. v. Henley 407 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Bogard GMC Co. v. Henley 407 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Wise v. Monteros 379 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
Wise v. Monteros 379 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
See, also, , , footnote 1; Udall on Evidence, Sec.