Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bohmfalk v. Vaughan, 357 P.2d 617.

90 citing documents.

Greg Shepherd v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Ariz. 2021
Greg Shepherd v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Ariz. 2021
(–40 (1960)); see also Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chem.
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Conversely, “[a] finding of fact cannot be ‘clearly erroneous’ if there is substantial evidence to support it.” ( and Reliable Elec.
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Reyes v. Mendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Reyes v. Mendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sertich v. Moorman 767 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Sertich v. Moorman 767 P.2d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
and the trial court must be affirmed if, on a reasonable view of the evidence, facts can be found which would sustain the judgment on any theory of law.
Deyoe v. Clark Equipment Co., Inc. 655 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Deyoe v. Clark Equipment Co., Inc. 655 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Wood v. Holiday Mobile Home Resorts, Inc. 625 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Criticized Wood v. Holiday Mobile Home Resorts, Inc. 625 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp. 631 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Pinnacle Peak Developers v. TRW Investment Corp. 631 P.2d 540 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Johnson v. Gilbert 621 P.2d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Johnson v. Gilbert 621 P.2d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Malisewski v. Singer 598 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Malisewski v. Singer 598 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Smith v. Hurley 589 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Smith v. Hurley 589 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Mullins v. Horne 587 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Mullins v. Horne 587 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Gaston v. Hunter 588 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Gaston v. Hunter 588 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
The drug companies cite two cases for the proposition that the plaintiff may not appeal an “invited error”, , , *41
ARIZ. S. TAX COMM. v. Southwest Kenworth, Inc. 561 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
ARIZ. S. TAX COMM. v. Southwest Kenworth, Inc. 561 P.2d 757 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
McClanahan v. Cochise College 542 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
McClanahan v. Cochise College 542 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Spector v. Spector 531 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Williams v. Williams, supra.
Keck v. Kelley 492 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Keck v. Kelley 492 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Acheson v. Shafter 490 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1971
Acheson v. Shafter 490 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1971
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
Parrish v. Camphuysen 488 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1971
Graham v. Shooke 482 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1971
Graham v. Shooke 482 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1971
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Weller v. Weller 480 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Cf. In re Brandt’s Estate
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
Natural Mother v. Adopting Parents 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
In Re Adoption of Baby Boy 472 P.2d 64 Ariz. 1970
Catron v. Watson 468 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Catron v. Watson 468 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
the Supreme Court again reaffirmed the rule, stating that it is the general rule that one partner cannot sue the other at law as distinguished from an action in equity with respect to partnership transactions except after-a full accounting and balance has been had, and such action is on contract