Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite White v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 348 P.2d 922.

29 citing documents.

Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 204 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz. 204 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Comm’n, P.2d 922 (1960); Maness v. Indus.
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Schuck & Sons Construction v. Industrial Commission 138 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Comm’n, , Wimmer v. Indus.
Warren v. Industrial Commission 39 P.3d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Warren v. Industrial Commission 39 P.3d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Comm’n, , -24 (1960); Schmitz v. Indus.
Lewis v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 614 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Lewis v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 614 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission, 24 Ariz.App.
Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Raban v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Maness v. Industrial Commission, supra; Moore v. Industrial Commission, 12 Ariz.App.
Hendry v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Cier v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Cier v. Industrial Commission 517 P.2d 1076 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Greer v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Greer v. Industrial Commission 494 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
” 102 Ariz. at 559 , 434 P.2d at 645 .
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 492 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Arizona Public Service Co. v. Industrial Commission 492 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
For Arizona decisions subsequent to Whyte recognizing the applicability of the Whyte rule
Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Corr v. Industrial Commission 490 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State Compensation Fund v. Cramer 474 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Compensation Fund v. Cramer 474 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Moore v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 476 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Moore v. Industrial Commission 470 P.2d 476 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Shaw v. Salt River Valley Water Users Ass’n, , 2 Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 65.20 (1952) ; 11 Schneider, Schneider’s Workmen’s Compensation § 2313 (3d ed. 1957).
Soto v. City of Tucson 445 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Soto v. City of Tucson 445 P.2d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
Myers v. Rollette 439 P.2d 497 Ariz. 1968
However, , wherein it was succinctly pointed out that under the Workmen’s Compensation Law the basis of an award by the Industrial Commission is whether and to what extent the claimant’s earning capacity has been affected by his injury arising out of injury in the course of his employment.
Maness v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1967
Maness v. Industrial Commission 434 P.2d 643 Ariz. 1967

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by