Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Caldwell v. Tremper, 367 P.2d 266.

66 citing documents.

Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company 399 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Huntsman v. First National Bank (1926) , 243 P. 598 ; Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Citizens’ State Bank (1931) , 296 P. 247 ; Brownell v. Freedman (1932) , ; Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co. (1942) , ; Caldwell v. Tremper (1961) , ; Zevon *36 v. Tennebaum (1952) , ; Sanchez v. Stremel (1964) , .
Aguilar v. Carpenter 399 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Sanchez v. Stremel, supra; , .
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
State v. Ross 396 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1964
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
Stearman v. Miranda 396 P.2d 622 Ariz. 1964
See, e. g. Young Candy & Tobacco Company v. Montoya, supra ; , ; , ; , ; , .
Dobbertin v. Johnson 390 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1964
Dobbertin v. Johnson 390 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1964
While this court has consistently held that breach of a statute or traffic ordinance amounts to negligence per se} , , such breach cannot be considered a sine qua non of negligence.
Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company v. Gonzalez 379 P.2d 135 Ariz. 1963
Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company v. Gonzalez 379 P.2d 135 Ariz. 1963
This court has limited power to reverse the action of a trial judge in granting a new trial for the reason that the verdict is not justified by the evidence
Gray v. Gardiner 375 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1962
Gray v. Gardiner 375 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1962
He may enforce the rule by an appropriate petition in this Court, , .
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
as follows: “The granting of a new trial is different from an order refusing a new trial, for in the former the rights of the parties are never finally disposed of a
Sisk v. Ball 371 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1962
Sisk v. Ball 371 P.2d 594 Ariz. 1962
Of course, a violation of the statutory duty must be also a proximate cause of the injury to constitute actionable negligence